Paul Vixie wrote:
Hi,
this author isn't in toronto so i'll answer here-- i had not and have
not compared -lee-dnsop-scalingroot- to -ohta-shared-root-.
Security consideration section of my draft explains why
allowing all the ISPs run their own anycast root servers
does not make plain DNS less
Francis Dupont wrote:
In your previous mail you wrote:
Does several thousands of queries per second during normal
operations with TCP matter?
= yes because it is at the limit current OSs can do on cheap stock
hardware...
Are you saying real root servers are using cheap stock
In your previous mail you wrote:
Does several thousands of queries per second during normal
operations with TCP matter?
= yes because it is at the limit current OSs can do on cheap stock
hardware...
Are you saying real root servers are using cheap stock hardware?
=
Francis Dupont wrote:
Does several thousands of queries per second during normal
operations with TCP matter?
= yes because it is at the limit current OSs can do on cheap stock
hardware...
Are you saying real root servers are using cheap stock hardware?
= current
David Conrad wrote:
Since I mentioned it and some folks said where is it?:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-03
In what context, did you mention it?
Masataka Ohta
On 7/23/2014 7:57 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
Since I mentioned it and some folks said where is it?:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-03
In what context, did you mention it?
Masataka Ohta
Masataka,
On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
Since I mentioned it and some folks said where is it?:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-03
In what context, did you mention it?
I asked if
David Conrad wrote:
I asked if the authors had compared their draft
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-dnsop-scalingroot-00) to yours.
Hm, the draft inappropriately assumes having a lot of
anycast addresses is better even though several ones are
enough.
But, the following statement in
In your previous mail you wrote:
Does several thousands of queries per second during normal
operations with TCP matter?
= yes because it is at the limit current OSs can do on cheap stock
hardware...
Regards
francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
PS: I wrote OS because the first reached perf limit is
David Conrad wrote:
Masataka,
On Jul 23, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-03
In what context, did you mention it?
I asked if the authors had compared their draft
Since I mentioned it and some folks said where is it?:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-03
Regards,
-drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
