Eric Orth writes:
> I have similar objections to this as the similar language that was in the
> draft
> before it was changed to the "MUST continue to follow" language referenced
> above.
>
> Anything similar to "MUST NOT alter ... processing" is vague over what
> constitutes an alteration to
Eric Orth writes:
> I have similar objections to this as the similar language that was in the
> draft
> before it was changed to the "MUST continue to follow" language referenced
> above.
>
> Anything similar to "MUST NOT alter ... processing" is vague over what
> constitutes an alteration to
Catherine Meadows via Datatracker writes:
> Reviewer: Catherine Meadows
> Review result: Has Issues
Hi Catherine,
Thanks for the review of the dnsop-extended-error draft. [and sorry
for the delay in sending this]
> The Security Considerations section mentions some valid points, but it
> is
Reviewer: Catherine Meadows
Review result: Has Issues
This ID defines an extensible method to return information about the cause of
DNS errors. It extends both the type of response that can contain error
messages and the type of messages that can be returned, and includes mechanisms
that can be
