On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:38:19AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
A zone's name servers should be reachable by all IP transport
protocols (e.g., IPv4 and IPv6) in common use.
what i meant was that a zone should have servers reachable by every
IP transport protocol in common use, in order
I reviewed the draft (sorry I was not in Prague). My comment which does
not duplicate the previous comments of Joe Abley, Andrew Sullivan, and
Rob Austein:
4.5. Multi-homing of name servers across protocol families is less
likely to lead to or encounter truncation, partly because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Sullivan) writes:
I note that in section 2.2.3, we have this:
A zone's name servers should be reachable by all IP transport
protocols (e.g., IPv4 and IPv6) in common use.
I have read differing opinions on whether it is better to have
protocol-dedicated
Dear colleagues,
It has taken me longer than I expected, but I have reviewed
draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-07.
I note that in section 2.2.3, we have this:
A zone's name servers should be reachable by all IP transport
protocols (e.g., IPv4 and IPv6) in common use.
I have read differing
