Hi Mark, On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:33:15AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > > draft-sullivan-dns-class-useless has lots provably invalid assumptions > in it that it is worthless in determining if new classes could be > deployed.
What are the "lots of provably invalid assumptions in it"? As far as I know, I incorporated changes that were an attempt to address comments you sent me; perhaps I didn't understand you at the time. But this is the first time I've ever heard about provably invalid assumptions. Anyway, I abandoned the effort because it became clear to me that there wasn't going to be any consensus around this: there were too many people too wedded to keeping classes around despite the obvious problem that they haven't actually been used when the obvious opportunities arose. I cheerfully predict that the DNS will be replaced before we ever have a significant deployment of a class that even remotely rivals the deployment of IN. But I'm not going to waste a lot of effort trying to forge a consensus about that. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
