Re: [DNSOP] request draft-hardaker-dnsop-csync be adopted as a WG item

2013-07-14 Thread Wes Hardaker
Paul Wouters p...@cypherpunks.ca writes: Comments: Sorry for the late response; working no too many drafts at once. 2.1.1.1 talks about the serial in the CSYNC record. Why did you prefer a soft link between that and the SOA serial, instead of a hard link? Or why is there is a need for a

Re: [DNSOP] request draft-hardaker-dnsop-csync be adopted as a WG item

2013-06-18 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Wes Hardaker wrote: Subject: [DNSOP] request draft-hardaker-dnsop-csync be adopted as a WG item A new version of I-D, draft-hardaker-dnsop-csync-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Wes Hardaker and posted to the IETF repository. This document specifies how