Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00

2009-09-01 Thread Stephan Lagerholm
I was actually thinking along the lines of what would it take to actually populate a reverse zone of size /N? where N would take various flavors like 64, 60, 56, etc. as an interesting experiment. Doug, You will need 4 billion disks with a capacity of 400 Gig each just to get 100 bytes for

Re: [DNSOP] OpenSRS support for IPv6 NS

2009-09-01 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Paul Wouters wrote: Deployment of IPv6 nameservers was very hard because most Registries did not support receiving IPv6 information. In part because of the huge market share at Registers that are OpenSRS resellers, and the lack of support within OpenSRS. It took a while, but

Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00

2009-09-01 Thread Douglas Otis
On 9/1/09 11:55 AM, Doug Barton wrote: When IPv6 forces use of positive reputations, reverse DNS entries become superfluous. I'm sorry, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Could you elaborate? We offer an email abuse tracking service that lists IPv4 addresses. Defending this

Re: [DNSOP] Draft on rDNS for IPv6: draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns-00

2009-09-01 Thread Mark Andrews
In message 1251822081.3172.8887.ca...@shane-asus-laptop, Shane Kerr writes: Mark, On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 11:52 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: If you deploy BCP 38 to the customer level TCP is a good enough authenticator for updating a reverse zone via UPDATE. As I mentioned at the IETF,