Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

2016-09-22 Thread hellekin
On 09/22/2016 12:31 AM, George Michaelson wrote: > > what community burden is taken in the wide, if a new TLD is > allocated in 6761 to break out of the DNS. > I'm sorry but, what do you mean 'to break out of the DNS'? == hk ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSO

[DNSOP] Working Group Last Call

2016-09-22 Thread Tim Wicinski
All This draft has been worked on and it seems that the Working Group is happy with the updates that have been made and I feel it's ready for the next step. This starts a Working Group Last Call for: "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3" draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse Current ver

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call

2016-09-22 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Tim Wicinski wrote: > All > > This draft has been worked on and it seems that the Working Group is happy > with the updates that have been made and I feel it's ready for the next > step. > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for: > "Aggressive use of N

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call on "Aggressive use of NSEC/NSEC3"

2016-09-22 Thread John Levine
>Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. Also, if someone >feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with >your reasons. I think it's ready to publish with one small caveat. In section 5.1, the text in the box says "resolvers MAY use NSEC/NSEC3 resource re

Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

2016-09-22 Thread hellekin
On 09/21/2016 11:30 PM, George Michaelson wrote: > None of these named spaces would "fail" to work as sub-spaces of .ALT > or .arpa or any other community-led IETF tech community managed label. > All of them with a requirement for global uniqueness will fail with .ALT, per .ALT draft. Etc. > yo