Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt

Hello, On 4.7.2017 05:54, Lanlan Pan wrote: > Hi Tony, > > We try to solve similar wildcard problem. > > NSEC/NSEC3 aggressiveuse (Section 5.3 Wildcards > ) > : > - NSEC/NSEC3 RR: give "NOT EXIST SUBDOMAIN" information. >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-02.txt

Hello Ted and dnsop, and sorry for delayed answer (below). Your message forced me to think more about the draft, this time without focus on the wire format. Spoiler alert: I still do not like the proposal in its current form. Please see below. On 21.7.2017 10:22, Ted Lemon wrote: > I am hearing

Re: [DNSOP] Status of "let localhost be localhost"?

Hello Mark, On 3 Aug 2017, at 1:39, Mark Andrews wrote: Most OS's don't treat localhost specially. It is just a entry in /etc/hosts and/or a zone in the local recursive server and/or localhost. in a zone on the search list. The last of these is how localhost is actually resolved on my machine

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-02.txt

Petr, forgive me for holding your feet to the fire on this, but you make several statements along the lines of "for me, ... is stretching the definition too far," "I disgree that this is less significant," et cetera, but you don't actually raise any technical objections—you just expressed uneasy fe

[DNSOP] [Errata Verified] RFC8078 (5049)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8078, "Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5049 -- Status: Verified Type:

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt

Hi Petr, Thanks for your comments, :-) Petr Špaček 于2017年8月10日周四 下午7:04写道： > Hello, > > On 4.7.2017 05:54, Lanlan Pan wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > > > We try to solve similar wildcard problem. > > > > NSEC/NSEC3 aggressiveuse (Section 5.3 Wildcards > > < > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop