On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:14 AM wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : Extended DNS Errors
> Authors : Warren
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
Donald Eastlake writes:
> 1. Maybe I'm confused but it seems to me that the RESPONSE-CODE field of 12
> bits
> plus the INFO-CODE field of 16 bits is 28 bits. So I don't understand the
> 2nd
> paragraph of Section 3.3 that talks about their concatenation fitting
> within 24
>
Thanks for your feedback about the extended errors draft. Below are
responses to some of your previously raised points in email to dnsop:
8.1 Puneet Sood
~~~
My comments on the latest version.
General: Thanks for writing this - it provides useful information for
our public
Thanks for your feedback about the extended errors draft. Below are
responses to some of your previously raised points in email to dnsop:
8.5 Evan Hunt
~
Stephane Bortzmeyer worked on implementing EDE in Knot the hackathon
in Prague, and mentioned a few issues that came up:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
Thanks for your feedback about the extended errors draft. Below are
responses to some of your previously raised points in email to dnsop:
8.4 Ralph Dolmans
~
I made an Extended DNS Errors implementation in Unbound during the
IETF104 hackathon. Implementing the code that
Thanks for your feedback about the extended errors draft. Below are
responses to some of your previously raised points in email to dnsop:
8.3 Shane Kerr
~~
Several folks have worked on implementing the
draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error at the IETF Hackthon yesterday and
today.
Thanks for your feedback about the extended errors draft. Below are
responses to some of your previously raised points in email to dnsop:
8.2 Stephane Bortzmeyer
~~~
At the IETF 104 hackathon in Prague, Vladimír Čunát and myself
implemented it in the Knot resolver
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
"DNS Stateful Operations".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5804
--
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Andrew McConachie
Hi,
After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying
Updated by RFC7766 but the document does not say that.
regards
John
On 9 Aug 2019, at 9:47, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
> "DNS Stateful Operations".
>
>
This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to
datatracker-proj...@ietf.org asking them to open a bug.
I believe this errata can be closed.
--Andrew
On 8/9/19 11:10, John Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying
Updated
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:45 AM Andrew McConachie wrote:
>
> This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to
> datatracker-proj...@ietf.org asking them to open a bug.
>
and I jsut saw this mail after sending mail to the secretariat --
this is now well covered :-)
W
> I
and fixed - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
Thank you all.
W
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:55 AM Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:45 AM Andrew McConachie wrote:
> >
> > This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to
> > datatracker-proj...@ietf.org
Thank you Paul.
As an incentive to everyone else -- there is an Easter Egg hidden in
this document: if you judiciously choose letters from the text (and
reorder them) you can create a very rude word.
W
P.S: Hey, it's worth a try!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:31 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> On Tue,
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:44 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> It's time again for everyone's favorite topic -- Special Use Domain Names!
>
> Back in October 2015 the IETF approved RFC7686 - 'The ".onion"
> Special-Use Domain Name' -- those who were involved no doubt remember
> that it was
16 matches
Mail list logo
