Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error and combinations of EDEs and RCODEs

2019-09-16 Thread Vladimír Čunát
On 9/12/19 8:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > SERVFAIL means, and will continue to mean, I can't help you, better luck next > time (or elsewhere). > > The new EDEs are *diagnostic* detail to aid in troubleshoots, but do not > override RCODEs. They are not a more fine-grained RCODE one might "act

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-09.txt

2019-09-16 Thread Vladimír Čunát
The following comments are only loosely related to multiple threads here, so let me post them in a single bunch. On 9/11/19 8:05 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Section 3.2 (code 2), may warrant more guidance on when this is > appropriate. AFAIK, there is nothing wrong with all DNSKEY algorithms >

[DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-07

2019-09-16 Thread Brian Carpenter via Datatracker
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready with Issues Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-07 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02

2019-09-16 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:00:39AM -0500, Suzanne Woolf wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > We’ve let the discussion continue because it’s been so active, but > we also haven’t forgotten we need to review and determine next steps > on this draft. I don't find anything about the