神明達哉 wrote:
>
> Anyway, my interpretation of the responses so far (or the lack of
> thereof) is that no one knows (or cares about) the exact range (per
> protocol standard) for these parameters. That's not the best result I
> wished to see, but at least it looks like I didn't miss anything
>
All
The second WGLC period ended, and I needed a bit of time to go over all the
comments and make sure they were all addressed, and that appears to be true.
The only thing I see are some comments were raised after the -12 version.
They've been addressed and can be updated on its way to IETF LC.
On 21. 10. 19 19:18, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
> The second WGLC period ended, and I needed a bit of time to go over all the
> comments and make sure they were all addressed, and that appears to be true.
>
> The only thing I see are some comments were raised after the -12 version.
>
Petr
Thanks for clarifying. I was going through so many notes, and needed a
check.
1. Forwarding Semantics
Let me think on this one with the authors and chairs.
2. Stub Resolvers.
OK
3. Standards-Track vs Not
That's more than reasonable.
Tim
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:48 PM Petr Špaček
