On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:02 PM Daniel Migault wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
>
> Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1]
> and a diff is available at [2].
>
> I propose the following text for clarification.
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1] and
diff can be seen at [2].
I propose the following text. Does it clarify the concern ?
Avoiding the configuration file to be updated prevents old configuration file
to survive to writing error on read-only
Hello, I'm still a bit skeptical.
1. Validation without logging.
At the end of 3.1 you claim that mode is still useful. When I focus on
intentional attacks, signing a malicious DS seems among the easiest
ones, and that can't be detected without the attacked machine doing
logging (the DS might be
Hi Bob,
I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1]
and a diff is available at [2].
I propose the following text for clarification. Feel free to let me know if
that addresses your concern.
OLD:
Not
Hi,
As a co-author, I am supporting the draft. I believe the document is
useful to encourage enabling DNSSEC validation on resolvers.
Yours,
Daniel
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bob Harold wrote:
> Looks useful, I will review.
>
> --
> Bob Harold
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:13 PM IETF
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Extended DNS Errors'
(draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-16.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari, Robert Wilton and Barry Leiba.
A URL
Hi Roy,
On 2 May 2020, at 10:09, Roy Arends wrote:
> Ed and I just submitted a new version of our private-use TLD draft.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arends-private-use-tld-01.txt
>
> This draft has substantial more information than the first draft. It explains
> that a private-use
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
Eric Orth writes:
> "Because long EXTRA-TEXT fields may trigger truncation, which is undesirable
> given
> the supplemental nature of EDE. Implementers and operators creating EDE
> options SHOULD avoid
> lengthy EXTRA-TEXT contents."
Thanks for pointing that out; it was indeed a failed edit
In article <5d255eee-4cab-44d6-8c47-bbe9c7f5c...@hopcount.ca> you write:
>> It contains plenty of examples of how user-assigned code elements are used
>> in the field, including
>other ISO standards, the UN, UNICODE, CAB/forum, and the IETF itself.
I also think it's an improvement, and concur
10 matches
Mail list logo
