Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis

chairs were waiting > for > a revision before starting a call for adoption. That revision took a few > months > but it has been done and DNSOP is ready to start a call for adoption. > > This draft addresess the bug found in the existing RFC. > > This starts a Call for Adopti

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Apr 11, 2018, at 08:50, Bob Harold wrote: > > > In various places, like 4.3. TSIG Record Format, "resolver and server" > is used which seems a little vague to me, since I use TSIG between

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis

Hi Bob, On Apr 11, 2018, at 08:50, Bob Harold wrote: > In various places, like 4.3. TSIG Record Format, "resolver and server" is > used which seems a little vague to me, since I use TSIG between master and > slave authoritative servers, neither of which is a resolver.

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis

all for adoption. That revision took a few > > months > > but it has been done and DNSOP is ready to start a call for adoption. > > > > This draft addresess the bug found in the existing RFC. > > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845b

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis

dy to start a call for adoption. > > This draft addresess the bug found in the existing RFC. > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis/ > >

[DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis

a Call for Adoption for draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. Please also