Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt

That was literally the fastest turnaround I've ever experienced. All the changes look good to me; thank you very much. On 03/05/2018 04:47 PM, Joe Abley wrote: On 5 Mar 2018, at 15:00, Richard Gibson wrote: To re-raise my unaddressed points: • The

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt

On 5 Mar 2018, at 15:00, Richard Gibson wrote: > To re-raise my unaddressed points: > > • The document should include planned text you mentioned acknowledging > lack of a signal to indicate "partial response" for section 4.1/section 4.3 > subset responses

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt

To re-raise my unaddressed points: * The document should include planned text you mentioned acknowledging lack of a signal to indicate "partial response" for section 4.1/section 4.3 subset responses ([1]). * "Conventional [ANY] response" is used but not defined ([2]). * The document

[DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-05.txt

Hi all, Per subject, see below, etc. I apologise for the ludicrous amount of time it has taken for me to do these final edits. Fortunately the beatings continued until the morale improved. I believe the -05 represents a reasonable facsimile of the consensus of suggestions that came up at the