On 05. 11. 18 19:30, Tony Finch wrote:
> Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:30:15PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>>
>>> To move DNSSEC adoption higher, CDS/CDNSKEY/... need to be supported
>>> by most registries and the signing and key rollover tooling needs
>>> to become
Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:30:15PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >
> > To move DNSSEC adoption higher, CDS/CDNSKEY/... need to be supported
> > by most registries and the signing and key rollover tooling needs
> > to become less brittle and more user-friendly.
Yes!
>
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:30:15PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> [ Was: Fundamental ANAME problems
> Dropped In-Reply-To:, to ensure a new thread. ]
>
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:28:52PM +0100, Måns Nilsson wrote:
>
> > > I'll defer to other people, but it seems to me that anything that
[ Was: Fundamental ANAME problems
Dropped In-Reply-To:, to ensure a new thread. ]
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 06:28:52PM +0100, Måns Nilsson wrote:
> > I'll defer to other people, but it seems to me that anything that depends on
> > recursive DNS servers being updated isn't a realistic solution.
