All
Thanks for all the feedback on this call for adoption. DNSOP will
be adopting this document to work on
thanks
tim
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:19 AM Loganaden Velvindron
wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:10 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > As we stated in the meeting
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:10 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
>
> All,
>
> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
> regular call for adoptions over next few months.
> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
>
Hi Tim,
Just to clarify, I fully agree there is a lot of similarities and we will
work on it with Joe.
Yours,
Daniel
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:16 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> Daniel
>
> Thanks for taking Joe's draft under advice and I agree there is work to be
> collaborated on.
>
> Tim
>
Thanks Brian. That is really much appreciated!
Yours,
Daniel
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:56 PM Brian Dickson
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:10 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
>> regular call for
Moin!
On 4 May 2020, at 21:08, Tim Wicinski wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for
draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/
Please review this draft to see if you think it
+1.
Agree with Stephane and support adoption of this draft.
Thanks
Sanjay
Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
Stephane Bortzmeyer Wed, 06 May 2020 08:48 UTCShow
header<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at
Daniel
Thanks for taking Joe's draft under advice and I agree there is work to be
collaborated on.
Tim
(speaking as a chair)
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 PM Joe Abley wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
> > Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I
Hi Daniel,
On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault wrote:
> Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought that
> the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958.
7958 came from draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor, but the confusion is entirely
reasonable!
Hi Joe,
Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought that
the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958. The current
draft mentions that TA should be associated with bootstrapping mechanism
and that boostrapping for the root zone should be extended to
On 4 May 2020, at 15:08, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/
>
>
> Please review this draft to see if
Thanks for the feed back Shumon,
I agree that we should at least clarify where the responsibilities are so
the mechanisms become more focused on smoothing the edges rather that
compensating what the other party may not do.
I also agree that fixed values might be more appropriated and the RDO
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 12:10 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
> regular call for adoptions over next few months.
> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
>
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:34 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:08:20PM -0400,
>> Tim Wicinski wrote
>> a message of 64 lines which said:
>>
>> > This starts a Call for Adoption for
>> >
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:34 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
> wrote:
>
> The draft apparently do not mention advices on expiration slack (such
>> as val-sig-skew-min and val-sig-skew-max in Unbound). Is there a
>> consensus on (I quote Unbound
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:08:20PM -0400,
> Tim Wicinski wrote
> a message of 64 lines which said:
>
> > This starts a Call for Adoption for
> > draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
>
> I think it is important to have such
Hi Stephane,
Thanks you for the comments. Please see inline my responses.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:49 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:08:20PM -0400,
> Tim Wicinski wrote
> a message of 64 lines which said:
>
> > This starts a Call for Adoption for
>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:08:20PM -0400,
Tim Wicinski wrote
a message of 64 lines which said:
> This starts a Call for Adoption for
> draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
I think it is important to have such a document, because DNSSEC
failures may seriously endanger the deployment
17 matches
Mail list logo