On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:16 PM Daniel Migault wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:53 PM Bob Harold wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:02 PM Daniel Migault
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bob,
>>>
>>> I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the comments.
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:53 PM Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:02 PM Daniel Migault
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Bob,
>>
>> I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
>>
>> Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here
>> [1] and a diff is
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:02 PM Daniel Migault wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
>
> Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1]
> and a diff is available at [2].
>
> I propose the following text for clarification.
Hi Bob,
I apology the previous email has just been sent unexpectedly.
Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1]
and a diff is available at [2].
I propose the following text for clarification. Feel free to let me know if
that addresses your concern.
OLD:
Not
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the comments. The new version of the file is available here [1] and
diff can be seen at [2].
I propose the following text. Does it clarify the concern ?
Avoiding the configuration file to be updated prevents old configuration file
to survive to writing error on read-only
Hi,
As a co-author, I am supporting the draft. I believe the document is
useful to encourage enabling DNSSEC validation on resolvers.
Yours,
Daniel
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:29 PM Bob Harold wrote:
> Looks useful, I will review.
>
> --
> Bob Harold
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:13 PM IETF
Looks useful, I will review.
--
Bob Harold
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:13 PM IETF Secretariat <
ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements in
> state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski)
>
> The document
