On Nov 17, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:21:01AM -0800,
Douglas Otis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 31 lines which said:
SPF is like using scripts, rather than bitmaps, to describe fonts
offering any number of features, such as flashing
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Douglas Otis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:16 -0600, wayne wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Douglas Otis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The SPF script language does not improve data compression. APL RR
(RFC3123) provides 10 times the informational density
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Douglas Otis wrote:
negative caching to avoid support issues. Even with the level of
amplification reduced, the source of this attack remains hidden and can
continue without recourse.
How can an attack be both a DDOS and remain hidden?
Please. With current
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:48 -0600, wayne wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Douglas Otis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:16 -0600, wayne wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Douglas Otis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The SPF script language does not improve data compression. APL
