Hi, all.
I'm a member of Japanese translate of Python document Project.
We complete translating Python 2.5 document last year and now
work for Python 2.6 Document.
I feel building document is slow a little. So I try to tune docutils
and Sphinx.
Attached patches make building document 30% faster.
稲田直哉 schrieb:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm a member of Japanese translate of Python document Project.
> We complete translating Python 2.5 document last year and now
> work for Python 2.6 Document.
>
> I feel building document is slow a little. So I try to tune docutils
> and Sphinx.
Great! I've already s
Hello,
There is a docutils specific mailing list:
docutils users
You will need to subscribe from sourceforge, or you can just post your
patch on sourceforge:
http://docutils.sf.net
Another patch was recently submitted by Georg Brandl offering a similar
speedup. No idea if it is in the sam
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> There is a docutils specific mailing list:
>
> docutils users
Actually, there are two docutils mailing lists, and I think that
docutils-develop is probably more appropriate for this.
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.py
Hi Georg.
>> Attached patches make building document 30% faster.
>> (In my environ. 330sec -> 220sec roughly)
>>
>> I post sphinx.patch to bitbucket, but I don't know where to post
>> docutils.patch.
>> Could anyone review these patch?
>
> I will, when I have a bit more time.
Thank you.
>> But
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009, Michael Foord wrote:
>>
>> There is a docutils specific mailing list:
>>
>> docutils users
>
> Actually, there are two docutils mailing lists, and I think that
> docutils-develop is probably more appropriate for this.
OK. I'll subscribe both.
--
Naoki INADA
KLab Inc
>>> But searchindex.js with PyStemmer is different to one with PorterStemmer.
>>
>> This could be a problem. The client-side search implemented in JavaScript
>> uses exactly the same stemmer (which is necessary to be able to find all
>> words). In short, if you can find a C implementation of the
