Re: DOCBOOK: Re: On the size of DocBook...

2002-09-06 Thread Adam Turoff
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:24:09PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: Why is Simplified DocBook easier to use than full DocBook? 1. Because when you open the DTD in emacs and read the content models, it's smaller. 2. Because the user documentation for Simplified lists fewer elements. 3.

DOCBOOK: Re: On the size of DocBook...

2002-09-06 Thread Adam Turoff
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:14:18PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: / Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | Just for kicks, how difficult would it be to refactor DocBook into | a simple core (based on Simplified DocBook, or the moral equivalent), | and implement the full DTD as multiple

Re: DOCBOOK: embedded image in RTF

2002-08-19 Thread Adam Turoff
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:55:08PM +0200, Stefan Kuhn wrote: Hi Jirka, thanks for the tip. It's a linux server :-( (first time in my live a windows server would have advantages!). I've come across this problem as well. I believe (but have not yet confirmed) that RTF *can* support embedded

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-27 Thread Adam Turoff
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Adam Turoff wrote: I started out with a vanilla teTeX 1.0.7 install, [...] I recommend that you use TeXLive instead of the teTeX that comes with FreeBSD. It's available from I understand that TeXLive

DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-26 Thread Adam Turoff
I'm trying to install PassiveTeX on a handful of computers. The Win* boxen configured like a charm thanks to MiKTeX. My FreeBSD box, however, has been no end of headaches. I started out with a vanilla teTeX 1.0.7 install, and had some problems with pdfxmltex; after poking around the list

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Adam Turoff
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:07:10AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: So my proposal is that we allow most (all?) inline elements to optionally function as simple links. We may also want to allow selected other elements (like funcprototype) to function as simple links as well. Which inline elements

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Tables in print output

2001-10-12 Thread Adam Turoff
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 02:15:51PM +0200, Katharina Udemadu wrote: I have trouble producing tables in print output. I get only one table row. And this message: openjade:/home/documentation/DocBook/dsssl/print/dbtable.dsl:404:5:E: flow object not accepted by port; only table-column flow

Re: XSLT 'or' statement (Was Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: How can I getstylesheet to bold?)

2001-07-31 Thread Adam Turoff
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:38PM -0400, Dan York wrote: xsl:template match=emphasis xsl:choose xsl:when test=@role='bold'|@role='strong' !-- changed line -- xsl:call-template name=inline.boldseq/ /xsl:when xsl:otherwise xsl:call-template

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: saxon

2001-05-25 Thread Adam Turoff
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:59:22PM -0400, Kunath, Marcel wrote: I was trying out an example but it gave me this error: F:\saxon\samplesjava com.icl.saxon.StyleSheet data\othello.xml styles\play.xsl dir=playhtml Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:

Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Linking in DocBook V5.0

-- Thread Adam Turoff
]; google_color_link = "006792"; google_color_url = "006792"; google_color_text = "00"; //--> Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Linking in DocBook V5.0 Adam Turoff DOCBOOK: Re: Linking in DocBook V5.0 Norman Walsh Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Linking in DocBook V5.0 Elli