Re: AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Dave Pawson
At 23:17 04/10/2002, Daniel S. Haischt wrote: >but if i am using ... > > translate('This is a foobar sentence.', ' ', ' ') > >... with saxon i am getting the following result ... > > ThisA isA aA foobarA sentence. You need to set the output encoding to html. HTH DaveP

AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
but if i am using ... translate('This is a foobar sentence.', ' ', ' ') ... with saxon i am getting the following result ... ThisA isA aA foobarA sentence. which saxon version are you refering to? regards daniel s. haischt -- > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m

AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
nope did not work out :( > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Togan Muftuoglu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2002 23:21 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into >   > > > * Daniel S. Haischt; <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Bob Stayton
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:54:15PM +0200, Daniel S. Haischt wrote: > but saxon should support the unicode representation > of extended characters, shouldn't it? > > and according to my unicode table   is equivalent to >   Perhaps I wasn't clear. Saxon does indeed produce   HTML output from   in

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Daniel S. Haischt; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: >but saxon should support the unicode representation >of extended characters, shouldn't it? > >and according to my unicode table   is equivalent to >  I could be wrong but if you use this parameter for saxon you should be able to get

AW: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
but saxon should support the unicode representation of extended characters, shouldn't it? and according to my unicode table   is equivalent to   regards daniel s. haischt -- > -Ursprungliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Bob Stayton
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Daniel S. Haischt wrote: > hello, > > this question might be likly off-topic... > > i am having a stylesheets that produces some > HTML output (taking a website xml file as input). > > sometimes i'll like to translate every whitespace > that occures in

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Dave Pawson
At 18:49 04/10/2002, Bob Stayton wrote: >In fact, the XSL FO stylesheets do not treat an appendix >in an article as back matter. There is a special template >in fo/component.xsl with match="article/appendix" that >processes the appendix as if it were a section. >It doesn't start a new page-seque

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Bob Stayton; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: >An article is processed in fo as a single page-sequence >(its template starts and ends a page-sequence, with >all its content in between). You would have to customize >the article template as well as the article/appendix >template to stop

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Country codes

2002-10-04 Thread Bob Stayton
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:37:03PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi > > There seems to be a discrepancy around the proper way to encode country > coudes and their expected processing in XML Docbook and the XSL > stylesheets. This matter already surfaced an year ago, but I got into > trouble n

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Bob Stayton
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:15:16PM +0300, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: > * Dave Pawson; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: > >>b) Should not appendix be forced to start on a new page > > > >Yes, IMO > > Ok then why it does not and I have to add an extra processing > instruction to force it > >

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Dave Pawson; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: >At 18:15 04/10/2002, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: >>Ok then why it does not and I have to add an extra processing >>instruction to force it > >? Because we don't control/own the docbook stylesheets? Yes yet the maintainers are very helpful some

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Dave Pawson
At 18:15 04/10/2002, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: >* Dave Pawson; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: >>>b) Should not appendix be forced to start on a new page >> >>Yes, IMO > >Ok then why it does not and I have to add an extra processing >instruction to force it ? Because we don't control/own

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Bob Stayton
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 05:52:05AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:49:09PM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote: > > > I started to extend the DocBook DTD to permit xi:include, > > > but I think it is kind of impossibl

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Dave Pawson; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: >>b) Should not appendix be forced to start on a new page > >Yes, IMO Ok then why it does not and I have to add an extra processing instruction to force it > >>2. If appendix is not back-matter what are back matters >Perhaps a personal cho

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Dave Pawson
At 12:38 04/10/2002, Togan Muftuoglu wrote: >1) Is appendix in an article considered a "back-matter" Yes, IMO, but I could probably argue for some books it may be a part of the body, since 'other' material is better grouped as backmatter. >b) Should not appendix be forced to start on a new pa

DOCBOOK-APPS: Country codes

2002-10-04 Thread jaccoud
Hi There seems to be a discrepancy around the proper way to encode country coudes and their expected processing in XML Docbook and the XSL stylesheets. This matter already surfaced an year ago, but I got into trouble nevertheless, so I thought to bring this discussion up again. Please help me dea

DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] defining CSS/FOSI styles for elements

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
hello, note: this mail belongs to the website-full.dtd. is it possible to define the custom style of a element using the tabstyle attribute? i used that attribute within a table defintion of one of my website xml source files, but the resulting HTML element still contains -> class="table"

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Yann Dirson
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:41:08AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 05:52:05AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that > > > in general, validation should oc

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: DOCBOOK: DocBook XSL stylesheet loses whitespacewith MSXML

2002-10-04 Thread Jirka Kosek
Kevin Yank wrote: > After tinkering with an example from MSDN... > > xs/htm/ceconReleaseNotesHandlingWhiteSpaceWithMSXMLProcessor.asp> > > It looks like it's whitespace-only nodes in the *output* document that > get stri

DOCBOOK-APPS: column.count.back

2002-10-04 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
Hi, Since I have got the coninuation of numbereing in the ordered lists I have another problem. Maybe I am getting this wrong. This for 1.55.0/fo 1) Is appendix in an article considered a "back-matter" a) If so should produce a two column Appendix right but it does not b) Should not appendix

DOCBOOK-APPS: [QUESTION] translating whitespaces into  

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel S. Haischt
hello, this question might be likly off-topic... i am having a stylesheets that produces some HTML output (taking a website xml file as input). sometimes i'll like to translate every whitespace that occures in a plain text string into   example: --8<---8<---8<-

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: number continuation with orderedlist

2002-10-04 Thread Togan Muftuoglu
* Norman Walsh; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 04 Oct, 2002 wrote: >| Thanks I did get the fo/lists.xsl from the sourceforge CVS but now when >| I am parsing it here is what I am getting. Any ideas ? > >Get a new common/common.xsl too. Or wait for the new release. Today, I think. Thanks a lot that saves

DOCBOOK-APPS: DocBook on Windows

2002-10-04 Thread Stefan Priebsch (e-novative GmbH)
Hi list, today, we released the e-novative DocBook Environment (eDE) 0.5.3, a ready-to-go environment to work with DocBook on Windows. You are welcome to download it for free at http://docbook.e-novative.de. Any questions, comments and suggestions are most welcome. Stefan -

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: number continuation with orderedlist

2002-10-04 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please ] / Togan Muftuoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | * Norman Walsh; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02 Oct, 2002 wrote: |>| 2 FW_MASQ |>| bla bla |>| |> |>Fixed. CVS checkin imminent. | | Thanks I did get t

DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: How to change paper-size

2002-10-04 Thread Norman Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ Follow-ups to docbook-apps, please ] / Lepekhine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: | I want to change paper-type to A4. | I investigated mail-list archive and found the advice | to change print/dbparam.dsl file. | I use docbook-xsl-1.55.0.tar.g

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:28:29PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 05:52:05AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that > > in general, validation should occur after XInclude processing. > > IIRC that would not meet the definiti

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Yann Dirson
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 05:52:05AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:49:09PM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote: > > I started to extend the DocBook DTD to permit xi:include, > > but I think it is kind of impossible (except for maybe > > Norm 8^). The xi:include element can replace

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:27:23AM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote: > One little item... > I've noticed in your example and the XInclude Candidate > Recommendation that the content model for xi:include is: > > > > Shouldn't there be a question mark to make xi:fallback optional? > > > > The spe

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:28:27PM +0200, Karl Eichwalder wrote: > Peter Ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > First I'd like to lobby for keeping your local copies of DTDs and > > stylesheets as a mirror or cache of the canonical URLs. > > There is no such thing like a canonical URL. Use a ca

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XInclude doesn't validate with xmllint

2002-10-04 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 09:49:09PM -0700, Bob Stayton wrote: > I started to extend the DocBook DTD to permit xi:include, > but I think it is kind of impossible (except for maybe > Norm 8^). The xi:include element can replace *any* > element or group of elements, so the content models of > every e