We're currently using bridgehead a lot to emulate section, mostly
where we don't want sections to be split out into separate HTML pages
(and where we can't prevent that simply via the chunking level).
bridgehead has a number of drawbacks, though, one of them being that
it's not a container
Hi,
I´m probably not the first one to ask this question, but I still need to
ask:
Is there any efficient, mostly MS-Word-like method to spell and grammar
check XML documents and/ or their transformation results (HTML, Pdf,
etc.)?
I admit that I´m pretty spoiled when it comes to spell checking.
On 10/18/2012 09:33 AM, daniel.ke...@finaris.de wrote:
is annoying since every second word is a technical term and therefore
highlighted as a mistake. ).
You can can configure Oxygen to skip checking in certain elements (e.g.
programlisting, code, whatever) to reduce the amount of noise.
David
I've used aspell for checking DocBook XML documents. You can configure it to
ignore certain elements like programlisting, and you can add lists of words to
ignore.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
b...@sagehill.net
From: joseph.a.gilv...@census.gov
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 8:35 AM
Yes, simplesect does all those things. You can control whether or not they
appear in the table of contents with the 'simplesect.in.toc' parameter.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
b...@sagehill.net
--
From: Stefan Hinz stefan.h...@oracle.com
Hi Bob,
Yes, simplesect does all those things. You can control whether or not
they appear in the table of contents with the 'simplesect.in.toc'
parameter.
Perfect. Thanks much!
Cheers,
Stefan
--
From: Stefan Hinz stefan.h...@oracle.com
