Indeed, I've just checked and Xerxes seems to have the same issue.
So, this is one caveat to keep in mind when processing modular DocBook
documents with Saxon/Xerxes.
Regards,
Alexey.
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:00:50 pm Bob Stayton wrote:
> I don't think Saxon itself supports XIncludes. Saxon
I don't think Saxon itself supports XIncludes. Saxon uses the Xerces parser
with the XInclude function turned on:
http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/sourcedocs/controlling-parsing.html
The XInclude spec says that xml:base attributes must be relative to the
closest ancestor xml:base. I'm pr
Hi Richard,
On Di, 2013-05-14 at 16:46 +, Kerry, Richard wrote:
> If they haven't come through please let me know and I'll find some
> other way of sending them.
I see an Outlook Web Access login screen. So, no they don't seem to have
come through.
Hth, Stefan.
--
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeld
Hi Lars, Bob,
Just one point: xsltproc does xml:base fixup on nodesets included through
XInclude, so inside the document there are xml:base elements added properly.
However, Bob's point still stands: if the top-level document is in non-current
directory, it will break the external references.
I don't know what everyone else is seeing in this message
One one client (Outlook) I'm getting little red Xs telling me the image is not
available.
On the other (webmail, using IE 9) I can see the images as I thought I was
sending them.
If they haven't come through please let me know
I've managed to get a border around my document's footer, using foot.sep.rule.
However, it isn't spaced how I want it and I can't get it to change in the way
I want.
I'm trying to get :
[https://webmail.siemens-it-solutions.com/OWA/attachment.ashx?id=RgDuafvq2wn5ToY5TFygcdi1BwAxjteD9W
Hi Lars,
You should get that message only when two conditions are met:
1. You are processing a DocBook 5 document with the non-namespaced stylesheets.
or
You are single-step profiling by using profile-docbook.xsl (probably your
case).
and
2. You are using xsltproc (which lacks an
Hello,
since a while I get the following warning during the transformation with
the docbook distribution:
WARNING: cannot add @xml:base to node set root element. Relative paths may
not work.
I'm not sure what triggers this warning, a Google search resulted in hints
about Docbook V5.0 but I'm st
On 11.5.2013 7:05, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> I agree that the problem was the slides templates were incorrectly generated
> - I stated
> so in my original email. However, my point is that target namespace can be
> precisely
> determined by checking the namespace declaration for the wrapper elemen
