Stefan Seefeld writes:
>> I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would fit
>> for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
>> beneficial to have one as it allows more fine-grained repository
>> permissions? Not sure if that's a
On Fri, October 16, 2015 6:24 pm, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld writes:
>>> I'm not sure if this definition of "large open-source project" would
>>> fit
>>> for a (hypothetical) DocBook organization. However, maybe it would be
>>> beneficial to have one as it allows
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> [... GitHub ...]
> DocBook as organization
Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically,
DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub, it's just a normal user named
"DocBook". :)
Shouldn't this
Hi Bob,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:33:33 -0700
Bob Stayton wrote:
> I finally finished putting together a new release of the DocBook XSL
> stylesheets. I apologize for the long delay. Future releases should
> come more frequently as we move over to Github.
Thanks a lot Bob
On 16.10.2015 02:10, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:25:51 -0400
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>
>> [... GitHub ...]
>> DocBook as organization
> Stefan, I fear your claim isn't completely right. :) Technically,
> DocBook isn't an organisation on GitHub,