Yes, all OK now. I must have been a bit too quick off the mark.
> -Original Message-
From: Ron Catterall
Mauritz
Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT). Do we have another delay
in the build?
I don't think so. It works for me.
Yesterday, I downloaded snapshot revision 7
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Catterall
>
> Mauritz
> Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT). Do we have another delay
> in the build?
I don't think so. It works for me.
Yesterday, I downloaded snapshot revision 7680. The modified
table.properties attribute-set was there in fo
Mauritz
Not appeared as yet (10:10 CST, 16:10 GMT). Do we have another delay
in the build?
Ron
Mauritz Jeanson wrote, at 2/13/2008 11:35 AM:
I agree. A default value of "auto" for the keep-together.within-column
property in the table.properties attribute-set is more reasonable.
I have chan
Brooks Moses wrote:
Mauritz Jeanson wrote, at 2/13/2008 11:35 AM:
I agree. A default value of "auto" for the keep-together.within-column
property in the table.properties attribute-set is more reasonable.
The current default value is "always"; it is inherited from
formal.object.properties.
I'd
