Re: [docbook-apps] Re: So, no books? (was Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Future of XSL-FO)

2012-05-10 Thread Tony Graham
On Thu, May 10, 2012 6:32 am, Nic Gibson wrote: > On 10 May 2012, at 01:22, Carlos Araya wrote: > >> Robin: >> >> When I expressed my opinion of FO being as complete as it needed to be >> perhaps I should have clarified a few things. >> >> Is Docbook a viable way to publish book-based content. Yes,

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: So, no books? (was Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Future of XSL-FO)

2012-05-09 Thread Nic Gibson
On 10 May 2012, at 01:22, Carlos Araya wrote: > Robin: > > When I expressed my opinion of FO being as complete as it needed to be > perhaps I should have clarified a few things. > > Is Docbook a viable way to publish book-based content. Yes, it is > > Is it as complete as it need to be for m

[docbook-apps] Re: So, no books? (was Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Future of XSL-FO)

2012-05-09 Thread Carlos Araya
Robin: When I expressed my opinion of FO being as complete as it needed to be perhaps I should have clarified a few things. Is Docbook a viable way to publish book-based content. Yes, it is Is it as complete as it need to be for me to consider it a full-fledged book publishing tool. No, and h