On 20.10.2013 18:08, Erik Leunissen wrote:
> Any thought's about that?
Not that it would help, but in XSLT 2.0 with it is
much easier to handle such situations.
Jirka
--
--
Jirka Kosek e-mail
On 20/10/13 18:08, Erik Leunissen wrote:
I find it difficult to decide whether it's best to accept this
fragility, or pursue a more robust solution (which isn't very inefficient).
Any thought's about that?
And that has also been resolved.
Erik.
On 20/10/13 17:37, Erik Leunissen wrote:
I'm baffled. What's going on here?
It appears that I've let myself be lured into an import precedence
issue. See:
http://docbook.10921.n7.nabble.com/RE-docbook-para-customization-affects-footnote-numbers-td3638.html
The solution offered by that s
I discovered a nasty side effect of a para customization:
When copying the d:para template from ./fo/block.xsl to a private
customization layer, and using that customization file to produce PDF,
the footnote numbers disappear.
This behaviour can be exercised using the attached docbook xml and
