Hi,
sorry for the delay.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:04:53 +0200
Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote:
On 16.10.2014 10:56, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
I'm not sure how easily could this be adapted to our current XSLT 1
base. Are there other (better?) solutions?
If you will not use extensions, it
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:11:27 +0200
Thomas Schraitle tom_s...@web.de wrote:
Apart from this technical implementations, I'm more interested in the
overall structure. What would be a good test environment for
stylesheet customizations? Or even the DocBook stylesheets itself?
Start at the bottom?
Hi,
when developing customizations for the DocBook stylesheets I have
always the feeling I forget something important and work without any
safey net. ;)
As such, it would be great to have a test framework which could
automatically check the transformation results with the expected
behaviour.
I
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:56:11 +0200
Thomas Schraitle tom_s...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
when developing customizations for the DocBook stylesheets I have
always the feeling I forget something important and work without any
safey net. ;)
As such, it would be great to have a test framework which
Hi Dave,
thanks for your reply! :)
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:25:40 +0100
davep da...@dpawson.co.uk wrote:
[...]
How do *you* develop and test your stylesheets? Has anybody used
such frameworks? Any help is greatly appreciated. :)
xspec is for the general case. Question: Is docbook
On 16.10.2014 10:56, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
I'm not sure how easily could this be adapted to our current XSLT 1
base. Are there other (better?) solutions?
If you will not use extensions, it should be possible to run DocBook
XSLT stylesheets in XSLT 2.0 processor, hence use XSpec.
On Thu, October 16, 2014 9:56 am, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
when developing customizations for the DocBook stylesheets I have
always the feeling I forget something important and work without any
safey net. ;)
As such, it would be great to have a test framework which could
automatically check
