On date Wednesday 2007-05-09 13:11:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefano Sabatini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 9 May
2007 11:38:19 +0200:
I would like to avoid to use MathML, due to its need for a graphical
editor, so using the compact tex notation
You can have the best of both
Hi docbook scribers,
this is my first post here.
I'm using the toolchains:
docbook XML -- xsltproc + XSL -- HTML
docbook XML -- xsltproc + XSL -- fo -- fop -- PDF
to issue the PDF and HTML versions of a docbook document.
I would like to use the tex notation for equations, then somehow
Stefano Sabatini wrote:
I think this should be possible, but the only relevant reference I
found googling around is this quite old post:
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/200112/msg00035.html
dating December 2001, while the DBTex method seems only to work with
DSSSL.
I'm
Stefano Sabatini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 9 May
2007 11:38:19 +0200:
I would like to avoid to use MathML, due to its need for a graphical
editor, so using the compact tex notation
You can have the best of both worlds (compact TeX-math syntax *and*
MathML output): use a