Reviving an old thread...
Eric Richardson wrote at 6 Sep 2001 09:05:53 -0700:
Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 5 Sep 2001 18:15:30 +0100:
At 10:33 05/09/2001 +0100, Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 1 Sep 2001 23:50:58 +0100:
I was thinking of the library
Dave Pawson wrote at 5 Sep 2001 18:15:30 +0100:
At 10:33 05/09/2001 +0100, Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 1 Sep 2001 23:50:58 +0100:
I was thinking of the library and cookbook stuff that Tony put on
Mulberrytech site,
I guess it was originated in SGML?
How
Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 5 Sep 2001 18:15:30 +0100:
At 10:33 05/09/2001 +0100, Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 1 Sep 2001 23:50:58 +0100:
I was thinking of the library and cookbook stuff that Tony put on
Mulberrytech site,
I guess it was
Dave Pawson wrote at 1 Sep 2001 23:50:58 +0100:
I was thinking of the library and cookbook stuff that Tony put on
Mulberrytech site,
I guess it was originated in SGML?
How quickly we forget. See
http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dsssldoc/glossary.html and other pages.
Regards,
Tony
Great, thanks.
http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dsssldoc/handbook/focr/focr.html should
be required reading for anyone who wants to know how dbcompon.dsl works (in
the DSSSL stylesheets).
At 10:33 5/09/01 +0100, Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 1 Sep 2001 23:50:58 +0100:
I was
At 10:33 05/09/2001 +0100, Tony Graham wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote at 1 Sep 2001 23:50:58 +0100:
I was thinking of the library and cookbook stuff that Tony put on
Mulberrytech site,
I guess it was originated in SGML?
How quickly we forget. See
Which source material? AFAIK all of the OpenJade/OpenSP sources are
available from SourceForge (including, I think, the original version of
Jade/SP they started from). Jade/SP were still available from James
Clarke's web site the last time I looked (http://www.jclark.com)
At 06:36 PM
Work on OpenJade/OpenSP is progressing, but not as fast as we'd like. The
maintainers don't have enough free cycles to work much on Jade.
Development has been concentrating on OpenSP. I think once the next
version of OpenSP is released, attention will return to OpenJade. In the
meantime, I
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:24:06PM -0700, M. Wroth wrote:
While (Open)Jade does not implement the whole DSSSL standard, I
still find it a more useful tool than any of the XML based
OTOH, Jade itself does not evolve any more - I've read that James
Clark has moved from DSSSL to other things -
Yann Dirson wrote at 27 Aug 2001 17:46:47 +0200:
There's also the now-defunct DSSSL Documentation Project at
defunct ?
Would you settle for moribund?
I happen to know that the main person behind the DSSSL Documentation
Project hasn't worked on it for years and, in fact, no longer works
Most of the effort that used to be going into DSSSL now seems to be
directed towards XSL. This may be the wave of the future, but I personally
find it unfortunate. While (Open)Jade does not implement the whole DSSSL
standard, I still find it a more useful tool than any of the XML based
Hi,
I've managed to find a couple of DSSSL tutorials, whose links should be
added to the FAQ. One is by Daniel Germán at
http://csgrs6k1.uwaterloo.ca/~dmg/dsssl/tutorial/tutorial.html and the
other is by Paul Prescod, a copy of which is at
12 matches
Mail list logo
