We use XEP and are pretty happy with it.
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Anstett [k15t.com] [mailto:tob...@k15t.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 2:38 AM
To: docbook-apps
Subject: [docbook-apps] FO processors
Hi,
I don't know if this is a little bit off-topic.
We are currently using
Hi Tobias,
On Samstag, 6. Juni 2009, Tobias Anstett [k15t.com] wrote:
We are currently using Apache FOP and like to switch to a processor
that is more powerful (e.g. auto-column size table handling).
Currently I am investigating:
- XSL Formatter (Antenna House)
- XEP (RenderX)
Do you
/xslfo_print
_wp (you have to create a free account to download the pdf).
David
-Original Message-
From: tom_s...@web.de [mailto:tom_s...@web.de]
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 3:38 AM
To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] FO processors
Hi Tobias,
On Samstag, 6
O'Reilly uses Antenna House. The initial use case (a number of years
ago) demanded maximum speed, which favored AH over XEP (at the time).
We've been generally happy with AH, so we haven't re-evaluated. I
suspect you'd be happy with either, but your choice may depend on
language support or other
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] FO processors
Hi Tobias,
On Samstag, 6. Juni 2009, Tobias Anstett [k15t.com] wrote:
We are currently using Apache FOP and like to switch to a processor
that is more powerful (e.g. auto-column size table handling).
Currently I am investigating:
- XSL Formatter
Colin Shapiro wrote:
I am wondering why XEP does not layer boxes based on the order in which they
are written, as FOP does (and presumably XF as well, given the examples
posted on Ecrion's site). Of course, with XEP, you can use z-index to fix
this, but sometimes that is not ideal as you
