Hi Peter,
Yes, the dates still are not handled quite correctly. Currently the
date can come from date, pubdate, or copyright/year. There should
be a single template that selects one based on a priority, which I
presume would be pubdate, date, then copyright/year. I'll log this as a
bug.
Thanks Bob. It validates just fine now.
On 11 August 2014 17:21, Bob Stayton b...@sagehill.net wrote:
Hi Peter,
Yes, the dates still are not handled quite correctly. Currently the date
can come from date, pubdate, or copyright/year. There should be a
single template that selects one based
