I am seeing differernt behaviour in image inclusion between fo/docbook.xsl
and fo/profile-docbook.xsl.
Using docbook.xsl, image inclusion is relative to the source xml area.
Using profile-docbook.xsl, image inclusion adds the destination path of the
fo file to the image path.
The latter breaks m
Hello Larry,
Thanks, this link was helpfull for my question. I forgot that
conversion to pdf consist with two steps: 1) converting docbook to fop
with xsltproc; 2) converting fop to pdf with apache fop. In first step
I forgot to add --xinclude xsltproc option.
RL> It sounds like the xincludes ar
Marcel Tromp wrote:
> I am seeing differernt behaviour in image inclusion between fo/docbook.xsl
> and fo/profile-docbook.xsl.
>
> Using docbook.xsl, image inclusion is relative to the source xml area.
>
> Using profile-docbook.xsl, image inclusion adds the destination path of the
> fo file to th
Hello,
I got an error when try to using
13.04.2010 12:47:24 org.apache.fop.fo.flow.ExternalGraphic bind
SEVERE: Image not found: images/callouts/1.svg
In .fo it seems like this:
I think my toolset misconfigured, but which tool need to be configured? I need
to
configure xsltproc to generate n
Hello Larry,
As I understand, there is no way to use syntax highlighting with
xsltproc, it's requres Saxon. Next, Saxon itself does not process
XInclude's, and I need to use xmllint to do this.
Also, saxon need the
F:\work\docbook-tools\docbook-xsl\fo\F:\work\docbook-tools\docbook-xsl\fo\par
2010/4/13 Александр Мартынов :
> But listings are still black and white. I'm looking in generated .fo
> and found that there is no differences with xsltproc generated .fo.
Try HTML output. You'll see that Syntax Highlithing is working. PDF
output by default will display shade or gray (AFAIK). You
It's not true that
PDF output by default will display shade or gray
I think that you are using saxon9 but you must use saxon65. (Saxon9 is a xslt 2
proc).
See http://xmlguru.cz/2006/07/docbook-syntax-highlighting
Regards,
--
Christophe HARO
christophe.h...@free.fr
-
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:20:47 +0400
Александр Мартынов wrote:
> As I understand, there is no way to use syntax highlighting with
> xsltproc, it's requres Saxon. Next, Saxon itself does not process
> XInclude's, and I need to use xmllint to do this.
Saxon can process xIncludes, but so can the x
Hello Mathieu,
I try to generate html using next bat file:
--- mkhtml.bat ---
java -cp
"F:\work\docbook-tools\syntax-hl\xslthl-2.0.1.jar;F:\work\docbook-tools\syntax-hl\saxonhe9-2-0-6j\saxon9he.jar"^
net.sf.saxon.Transform^
-o:%2^
-s:%1^
-xsl:%~dp0\..\docbook-xsl\html\docbook.xsl^
highligh
2010/4/13 Александр Мартынов :
> Hello Mathieu,
>
> I try to generate html using next bat file:
>
> --- mkhtml.bat ---
> java -cp
> "F:\work\docbook-tools\syntax-hl\xslthl-2.0.1.jar;F:\work\docbook-tools\syntax-hl\saxonhe9-2-0-6j\saxon9he.jar"^
> net.sf.saxon.Transform^
> -o:%2^
> -s:%1^
> -xs
Hello Christophe,
Yes, Your are right, I using Saxon 9.2 and have got warning from saxon
about xslt v1.0, but I didn't think that is very important. I wil try
your recommended version of saxon.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 3:52:58 PM, you wrote:
CH> It's not true that
CH>
CH> PDF output by de
Hi,
I think you need to set the parameter 'callout.graphics.path', as described
here:
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Icons.html#CalloutIcons
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
b...@sagehill.net
- Original Message -
From: "Александр Мартынов"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:4
12 matches
Mail list logo