On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:35:21AM -0500, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
There's a section on this in the FHS (Filesystem Heirarchy Standard).
Basically it says that things belong under /usr/share/sgml. Take a look
at a modern debian or redhat (7.1 or newer) system, as those are pretty
close to
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:40:28PM +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
Should be able to just comment out the DTDDECL line in the catalogs.
But then those programs able to use them won't use them...
--
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alcove.com/
Free-Software Engineer
Dave,
This questions's been discussed on the list and on the debian-sgml
list before, so might be good to put it into the FAQ.
Looking back at archived messages, the answer's been that you need to
use a processing instruction instead of an element (so also need to
write support in your XSLT
Hi, is there apart from tables and list-items another way to have two
different alignments in one line? What I want is a right-aligned figure in
front of text (e.g. numbered headings). Using tables I soon (ca. at page
150, i.e. maybe the 500th fo:table.../fo:table) get out of memory.
Same
/ Christopher R. Maden [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| At 10:09 30-10-2001, you wrote:
| At 15:48 29/10/2001 -0800, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
| Care to elaborate? What put you off Ælfred?
|
| 2.8 xml spec. ents in internal subset
| Aelfred gets it wrong.
|
| Care to elaborate on that?
Hi again,
The missing ID disappeared from that document on a fresh Mandrake Linux
8.1 install [1].
Amusingly enough, the opposite problem (duplicate ID) appeared on
another document with fop!!!
Looks like a fop bug, I can see a similar bugreport in their bug
database.
Thanks all, Camille.
[1]
At 13:59 30/10/2001 -0600, Matthew Braun wrote:
Dave Pawson (though possibly not the `strlen(Dave Pawson) == 11!!!' Dave)
Oh dear, I can see that haunting me. For the record,
I didn't originate it.
The Duck book describes beginpage like so:
snip/
This sounds to me like beginpage is
At 09:32 31/10/2001 +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
Mmm. That's how I wanted it to be used.
This makes it a style-sheet problem properly. Thus I doubt you will find a
DocBook tag that does what you want.
Doesn't beginpage sound 'about right' though?
Regards DaveP
