Bonjour,
I am using docbook-xsl-1.60.1, xsltproc, and FOP 0.20.5rc2.
I was happy with Jens's postprocessing fix for PDF bookmarks in:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/200301/msg00251.html
until I noticed that there was no bookmark created for the Table of Contents.
When I
Platform: RedHat 8.0,
IBM Java2 1.3.1
saxon 6.5
apache (Sun?) resolver 1.0
DocBook XML 4.1.2 (native to RedHat 8)
DocBook XSL 1.60.1 (from an RPM created by myself)
When I try building my documents, I get error messages about the
dbnotnx.mod file
I've been working all morning on trying to customize my headers. (I
can't believe the default is to put the name of the current section). I
am using double sided, so I want the Book Title to be left justified on
the even pages, and the chapter name to be right justified on the odd
pages.
I have
Stefan Bylund:
Hi Damian,
I first tried xincluder but I soon found out that xmllint is more fully
featured. I use the following command to resolve all xincludes before invoking
the XSLT processor (Saxon):
xmllint --xinclude --catalogs document.xml resolved.xml
Note that xmllint uses
Thank you. I'm trying both Xincludes and xmllint with much success.
-Damian
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bylund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:45 AM
Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: XIncludes
Hi Damian,
I first tried
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I wanted to ask if Fop is really to blame for this, since by reading
| Dave Pawson's book on XSL-FO on page 27 he sais that footnotes do
| inherit properties from the content in which they occur. If this is
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/ Steinar Bang [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Yesterday I discovered that when I inserted a CDROM containing a
| chunked HTML document on a Win2k machine, I found some of the pages
| missing. The reason was that the file names were too long.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It's been a month or so, has there been any follow-up on this? Do I
need to add some more properties to the stylesheets?
/ David Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Ok, that make sense, but when I add border-top-width.conditionality=retain
Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you need the ID-based filenames?
Need, no. Prefer, yes.
Would the automatically generated names not be ok?
Are these names persistent, if sections change order in the XML
source?
