Re: [docbook-apps] Capital latin "Q" with dot above
Unicode provides "combining diacritical marks" : you can use "COMBINING DOT ABOVE", the hexadecimal value of which is 307 : in xml : Q in text, on a linux platform (Hold down the shift and control keys while typing 'u' and the hex value) Q̇ Please note that result is dependant on the font you are using ; but it works for most standard (browser) fonts. More information is available at http://www.unicode.org and charts http://www.unicode.org/charts/ can be helpful (I have local copies available when working with docbook !) jmt On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:13:37 +0200 oa...@docbook-autor.de wrote: > Hi, > > as it seems there isn't an entity for a capital latin "Q" with a dot > above like . > > I'm wondering how to realise generic diacritical marks with DocBook > (besides using an inline image...). > > Using "Q" or "Q" result in "Q˙" or "˙Q". > > Any help would be appreciated. > > I'm using: > > DocBook 5.0 > DocBook XSL Stylesheets 1.79.1 > fop2.1 > > Best regards > Michael > -- Jean-Marie Thomas http://www.dxdydz.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] future of DocBook XML Schema (XSD)?
I *never* used the XSD schema in fifteen years. jmt On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:51:14 -0700 Bob Stayton <b...@sagehill.net> wrote: > The DocBook Technical Committee is considering dropping the XML Schema > version of DocBook in a future version 6. We would like to hear from > any members of the DocBook community who would be affected by this change. > > Let me be clear that this change is not on the horizon, but part of our > long term planning. The DocBook TC takes great care in maintaining > backwards compatibility on point releases because we know how much the > DocBook community relies on stable sources. When DocBook rolls to a new > major version number, we treat that as an opportunity to introduce > changes that are not backwards compatible. The change from 4 to 5 was > such. If we foresee such changes coming, we give the DocBook community > very advanced notice to prepare for them. > > We will continue to maintain the DocBook standard in RelaxNG with > Schematron rules, and will continue to generate a compatible DTD. > > However, the process of maintaining the XSD version of DocBook is > proving burdensome because it cannot be completely generated by a > conversion program, and requires manual tweaking. Because we are not > sure if anyone is actually using the XSD version, we are wondering if > this is worth the effort. If you are using it, or have tools that > depend on XSD, please let us know. > > You can reply directly to me if you don't want to discuss it on the > mailing list. > -- Jean-Marie Thomas Informatique technique et scientifique http://www.dxdydz.net -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1 mQGiBEInVigRBACOHrl2Qr65lZClR5EwMFwKn8onFRRhOMm4WBUgGRoHr3vfayaT yTuI6fmF1oaPmT0xzCyW1b1V+F7+6kVJXBHMGbWpV6J5qWfrSTKmuL2mtGwFqbXV zbzPePo3ZS4hxs4jqEC+tjZM4ZPZgm90U4krr/afXHDz77o2dMNuCn7IpwCgwuJr rrtS4wj3z+ao4QZX+M/fkWUEAIfwhew5U39kh3n+ElfEEY37wUGQlpfXHFoYoCM8 t2S/Gt+09kWmfZU4eMmUtSNkLkXN8IlRw2QB2wJsOd1LulN+DKfK7zuihCQy0pCf JrOcmPVppG437ZJ3Cw2GjfOREBqyexBqr7lYVImMVtHH9YLXMak0aMcTb/l44lek NkoiA/9ly+LdVIh0cciTtEMQTiMgwAkijKf+WbV+g/V4OYSn4qhbLibb4mXZqqoD NP7FqdMAlFASAQhhGoJHOLSDlD4cqgZpFUEnx9URcCx+ft1UwxQro55RP769IzwF +CTPUEW+cRX1EuiQBq6iIA2waf/U+96bJFjghbB1EiW0gJ0WxLQ5SmVhbi1NYXJp ZSBUaG9tYXMgKFByb2Zlc3Npb25hbCBhZGRyZXNzKSA8am10QGR4ZHlkei5uZXQ+ iF4EExECAB4FAkInVigCGwMGCwkIBwMCAxUCAwMWAgECHgECF4AACgkQ5tttVGy4 2CQbIwCgjM9vJfcWO3C9HxN1EF8iVW8GlB8AnRxvEXaJPNNDmX6LqNrvC87WyxCs 0cZPxk0BEAABAQAAAP/Y/+AAEEpGSUYAAQEBASwBLAAA/+EAFkV4 aWYAAE1NACoI/9sAQwAFAwQEBAMFBAQEBQUFBgcMCAcHBwcPCwsJ DBEPEhIRDxERExYcFxMUGhURERghGBodHR8fHxMXIiQiHiQcHh8e/8AACwgAUAA6 AQEiAP/EABsAAAIDAQEBAAYHAwQFCAIB/8QAOBAAAQMCBAMGAwYG AwAAAQIDBAURAAYSIRMxUQcUIkFhgXGRoTJCUmKx8AgVIyRUwXKSov/aAAgB AQAAPwCqy+0xBdUtQHgFvXfCzr9dZgmckH+q/fQ2BcnxfTGIznGusR0NR3kRmgoq GlIUu978zj2vM2YpC9b1XdBUrUfCi1/hbE9CzK5ElvInJS8HklJdRsRy3I5H6Y2p Ffj96ExClqWUgBSU7G3xxnu18cHu6GFFr8Kl7deWIf525/jNfLEcmuynyorUdI3s STtizkWkIqdScm1BCnVld0auQ26dBcYduWezfLVffS/OhBwcNKU7WBAN9vn5dcF7 PYDkOY+2+5EfaS2q5QybBY6E88X19mWSKJT3IVLy5GAUCFF/U4Tf/lfHPHatkqNl ivMyI4UxSpyyCmxPAc9Oo3H7GMKjUKJOLi+O4ptKylNttQHn6YtqodNBI7pL2/Pj KiZbnLSy5IRwWHFBOpRHI+mDDJzLbtfQ0kgNa1ITY7W2x0pkFuMzDYbCASDpKr8h 1w0IrDBY2QkJsNwq2I6tSoLjBUUXURe+Eh2r5dZqKRDcQki5KbpBsShe/wCmE2Yj EWTw2GkMpIuUpFrnEfd2/wDHQfc4q5oefj5WU9FbsWUFzyA0207X52vinlB5EJqm KRqWXglwlO5sBv8A6w/sqZ6g09uOh+i1MsFQSXi2kJHU7m9vW2HPSaxSp8TixHCW whDpPoVHbGPVO0bL8WpuUx2POUUp2ebZ1o6b2Nx7jAFnyoMTIT9QYdU2WHkaSUkf aIT7/aPL0wq+0CnRqbVITLepMhTJVISSTZZJ5XAttbbAY7NnB1YSvwhRtt5YIF0+ PWspOwnHGkOBkNtpUrdwrX/o2+eBfKOX5bzXCjrW4qKsJXcqJavzKdJB23O9xbnh 0ZMosXL8aoVkzXpEuRFSwEKcWtCCN9ekgeLY/etvy6Tdkk2rVGg5yTFU8p5or7mn jK0KKUC3naylA/PG/KyvIar0OquT5ndmWllDYcVwpGoeEkpuQU39AbfG/mJRqnXl yIHeUtqDzTynlNg6g2tLh22F7AJ98LTtUkCVnWW6hKUpbfLSUp3ACfDt8icAzzBL yz+Y+XrglogbZERUpNhqTuSBp6K9LEXvifs0ebiZ1nuoJ4ZkBAcSB530q9wnDVz5 IhMZf7vDjBchxIIVzHPc+u29vTHr+HiGlyn1ySqUzZWpsJ5EEb8vh+owy4CKeuI0 xMYcQFgqSUqISrfcW+uMSt1mg0qqPsOyERk9xccbTsgLSgpBCdxv6Dc2OObquStb ThuSV3JJ54qlAvzxfrKEppaSdv6ZBv6XxU7PX2U16XGdWEl1lK0G/wB9HiSf/Kh7 4Pc2yEwpkVx+PMkwlITfhBJ0bciLj5jB1kSr5PiU9mT3CYw45zW5EcBtbbkLEb+u DunT4Fbih+C6HoyVjQdKhax6ED6Y5y7dq2zOz461HutEEJYSEmw2G+/xP0wITqtG cZbCdQUkg+IgYpmqRvxp/wC4wO1XM9Vc0x1pkpCD9lSrfpizkyTITUGJpjlCG3U3 P4kk2I+YA98Pvs+TErUeXEnyFLU05dCvvWHJXuN8MeFQE6kqUtC2dPJTQBPrytia ozkUyK+3EQlpEds2A8zb9nHGeYEN1CS/OM+Y/MmOl0N8gVLVe31x8ptCjTH1x+7O cRDC3Sp5+wukE6bAXvtgZUyvUf7V0b8t8beZuEjM0qQ4UhPHuonkNhh2ZRyIKjlK n8JlCZrTZUWybBwKtrQT5HbY9ca1PodSy3NNRaQ5w9QQ4hY0kEdeh+P1w1KBUp02 mNL/AJc+oIRp4ix4SR+YbYuQ6OZqwiWkOGUdJ22CPvAX35X39euONc10QZe7RJVK WVaYNRdbRc80oV4T7pscaENKjmOQmxB4DqUpSjY2WRfGkqOpRKtPPflhMuz5mZs2 QYsZtTCZEpsJSTqsbgXPyvjvLL9MepsdF2zZJ5cv3198HkSLT6lASzIShxZSEqIT ZQ9D1xmw6a/lluY1qDlLUsvoTvZrbcHonz2ufjggokNDMcSFPiQt4AhwfZCTuEp/ Lv744t/iyDuXe2qVKfZJiz2kSG1gciUBCvqi/v64y6FmD
Re: [docbook-apps] footnotes author
Thank you very much, it works perfectly fine ! jmt On Thursday 23 October 2014 11:15:00 Bob Stayton wrote: Hi Jean-Marie, Changing the footnote mark in a footnote is a little tricky because the mark has to be generated within the same formatting block as the para, so it is on the same line as the footnote's text. The stylesheets each have a template written specifically to handle this case. For fo output, there is a template in fo/footnote.xsl that starts with: xsl:template match=d:footnote/d:para[1] |d:footnote/d:simpara[1] |d:footnote/d:formalpara[1] priority=2 That template formats the footnote mark within the fo:block of the first para. To add the role, you'll need something like: xsl:if test=../@role xsl:text [/xsl:text xsl:value-of select=../@role/ xsl:text] /xsl:text /xsl:if Since this template's context is para, you'll need to use ../@role to refer to the role attribute on the footnote. You can add inline formatting as needed. For HTML and epub, there is a similar template in footnote.xsl that starts with: xsl:template match=d:footnote/d:para[1]|d:footnote/d:simpara[1] priority=2 These templates assume the first element in a footnote is a para. If it isn't then you have more work to do. If you need any additional help, feel free to ask. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises b...@sagehill.net On 10/23/2014 3:08 AM, jmt wrote: Hello list, I have a document with notes from different authors, e.g. para some text footnote role='author'bla bla/footnote another sentence footnote role='translator'glop glop/footnote /para The document is to be rendered in html, epub and pdf. How do I attribute the notes according to the role, e.g. [1] [author] bla la [2] [translator] glop glop Thanks in advance ! jmt -- http://www.dxdydz.net Jean-Marie Thomas Informatique scientifique et technique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
[docbook-apps] footnotes author
Hello list, I have a document with notes from different authors, e.g. para some text footnote role='author'bla bla/footnote another sentence footnote role='translator'glop glop/footnote /para The document is to be rendered in html, epub and pdf. How do I attribute the notes according to the role, e.g. [1] [author] bla la [2] [translator] glop glop Thanks in advance ! jmt -- http://www.dxdydz.net Jean-Marie Thomas Informatique scientifique et technique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] Linux-based editors?
Hi, Why not use Emacs + nxml mode for man text, and get the MathML from http://www.mathmlcentral.com/Tools/ToMathML.jsp Hope this helps, jmt On 2008 04 07, Anagha Tongaonkar wrote: Hello Folks, I have a very specific requirement of being able to create DocBook documents that will have text, tables, math equations, and images. So far, I have been looking at various XML editors, on Linux platform. However, I am unable to find any Linux-based editor that has DocBook support and equation editing capabilities. The closest workaround I have found is - use a commercial XML editor that has DocBook support and for equations use open-source equation editor such as Amaya (http://www.w3.org/Amaya/). Create MathML equations in Amaya, attach namespace prefixes to the mathml. Insert these mathml equations in DocBook article in a equation elements, in XML edit mode. However, the intended Authors are not familiar with XML, so I would like to be able to operate in Author mode only, not XML mode. I was wondering if anyone has any solution for such a specific requirement? Appreciate your helpful replies. TIA, Anagha - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Informatique technique et scientifique http://www.dxdydz.net Jean-Marie Thomas +33 (0)3 88 32 93 64 +33 (0)6 37 18 86 63 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[docbook-apps] emacs + nxml (newcomer)
Hi, list ! I use emacs + nxml mode in Debian ; this package still uses the Docbook schema from V4.2, so I replaced to the original schema by the schema for V5.0RC3. Works like a charm, except that introducing a xml:id for person unvalidates the document. I am far from being a specialist of emacs - I use it almost mostly for xml authoring, psgml and now nxml - so it might be a lisp problem or some sort of, but I'm unable to solve it. Any clue ? Best regards, jmt -- -- Informatique technique et scientifique http://www.dxdydz.net Jean-Marie Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +33 (0)3 88 32 93 64 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [docbook-apps] Re: how to upgrade docbook-xml properly w.r.t. nxml-mode - /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/nxml-mode/schema/*.rnc
Actually I would like to see, that the *.rnc files in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/nxml-mode/schema/ get removed and nxml-mode gets set up to make use of the *.rnc files in /usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/rng/5.0CR3/ or whatever new or old version one wants to make use of. Obviously your paths may vary, mine are from a mixture of SUSE 10.1 through 10.3alpha... and I actually assume, they are file system standard compliant, but who knows ... From a Debian unstable, I made the following changes in the nxml-mode package : 1 - in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/nxml/schemas I renamed docbook.rnc docbook.rnc_V4.2 2 - I copied docbook-5.0CR3/rng/docbook.rnc to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/nxml/schemas/docbook.rnc and tested ok : the person element admitted an xml:id attribute Then, while I had done the same for a Debian testing, with the unsuccess I have reported, I reinstalled the nxml-mode package, and proceeded to the same modification, i.e. remplacing the original docbook schema (V4.2) to the V5.0CR3 ; and tested ok. No explanation : lisp is out of my reaches. Thanks for your help, jmt -- -- Informatique technique et scientifique http://www.dxdydz.net Jean-Marie Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +33 (0)3 88 32 93 64 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]