Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-28 Thread Holger Rauch
Hi! On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Adam Turoff wrote: [] teTeX anyway While TeXLive may be better, it's a rather big download (~270 MB), a snapshot of an ISO filesystem, and quite unlikey to become a FreeBSD port You don't have to port *all* of TeXLive to FreeBSD I think you can surely omit the

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-28 Thread Patrick Hartling
I am having these exact problems with TeX Live installed yesterday from the referenced ISO. I have the updated xmltex.tex from the PassiveTeX website, and I am using the PassiveTeX version from the same site. The FO was generated by Xalan with PassiveTeX extensions enabled. I get identical

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-27 Thread Adam Turoff
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Adam Turoff wrote: I started out with a vanilla teTeX 1.0.7 install, [...] I recommend that you use TeXLive instead of the teTeX that comes with FreeBSD. It's available from I understand that TeXLive

DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-26 Thread Adam Turoff
I'm trying to install PassiveTeX on a handful of computers. The Win* boxen configured like a charm thanks to MiKTeX. My FreeBSD box, however, has been no end of headaches. I started out with a vanilla teTeX 1.0.7 install, and had some problems with pdfxmltex; after poking around the list

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Problems with passivetex / pdfxmltex

2002-02-26 Thread Holger Rauch
Hi! On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Adam Turoff wrote: I'm trying to install PassiveTeX on a handful of computers. The Win* boxen configured like a charm thanks to MiKTeX. My FreeBSD box, however, has been no end of headaches. I started out with a vanilla teTeX 1.0.7 install, [...] I recommend