On 2018-06-15 00:48, Frank Steimke wrote:
...
So writing down the combining character sequence is no problem at all,
however it has to be supported by a font in the final PDF file. If the
default font does not work: Have a look at Google Noto Fonts
(https://www.google.com/get/noto/).
SIL's
n the final PDF file. If the default font
does not work: Have a look at Google Noto Fonts
(https://www.google.com/get/noto/).
Sincerely,
Frank
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: maxwell
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2018 20:48
> An: Jan Tosovsky
> Cc: 'DocBook Apps'
> Bet
On 2018-06-12 14:14, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
You cannot combine multiple characters to form the composed one. If
there is Unicode character for this combination, you can use it
directly. If it is not displayed correctly, it means your font doesn't
contain this character and you need to switch to the
On 2018-06-11 oa...@docbook-autor.de wrote:
>
> as it seems there isn't an entity for a capital latin "Q" with a dot
> above like .
>
> I'm wondering how to realise generic diacritical marks with DocBook
> (besides using an inline image...).
You cannot combine multiple characters to form the
Unicode provides "combining diacritical marks" : you can use
"COMBINING DOT ABOVE", the hexadecimal value of which is 307 :
in xml :
Q
in text, on a linux platform (Hold down the shift and control keys
while typing 'u' and the hex value)
Q̇
Please note that result is dependant on the font you
Hi,
as it seems there isn't an entity for a capital latin "Q" with a dot
above like .
I'm wondering how to realise generic diacritical marks with DocBook
(besides using an inline image...).
Using "Q" or "Q" result in "Q˙" or "˙Q".
Any help would be appreciated.
I'm using:
DocBook 5.0
