At 02:05 PM 5/9/01, Galen Boyer wrote:
Three Questions (Feel free to point me to other documentation that
I obviously may not have read)
1) It looks like the local variables section may be a standard
section for editors to look for? I thought this was just an
Emacs thing.
I think it is.
/ Ed Nixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I'm new to the list so the usual FAQ-type apologies. I *have* searched
| the archive, however, without much success.
http://www.siliconpublishing.org/svgfaq/
may be a start?
Regards DaveP
xfree86, the documentation leg of the screen driver
bit of Linux, is moving to docbook.
If there is anyone out there who wants practice at marking
up stuff in docbook - XML, as an exercise,
perhaps you could contact me off list.
(slides out carefully).
Hopefully, DaveP
At 05:45 PM 7/27/01, Jirka Kosek wrote:
if you want to
use XMetaL you must create these customizations by yourself.
I'm sure there are docbook customisations around for xmetal?
IIRC a couple of groups have addressed this problem.
Regards daveP
At 22:57 27/08/2001 -0400, Roy Hoobler wrote:
Hi,
I'm not too thrilled about the website xsl pages. I'd like to use the
Docbook format. Usually web applications consist of dynamic content and
static content. I'd like to get the static content in a docbook format
(all in one place). As far
At 11:20 17/09/2001 +0200, Ken Walton wrote:
Hi All
I am using ver4.1 of DocBookx.dtd with the xsl stylesheets and Xalan.
In my book I am declaring a number of documents as entities. Can you tell me
how I can force these into seperate documents rather than have them all
included in one htm
At 09:42 25/09/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
Uh-huh. I almost said that myself. Of course, you *really* ought to
use:
link linkend=mytarget
inlinemediaobject
imageobject
imagedata fileref=mygraphic.gif format=GIF/
/imageobject
textobject
phraseSimple alt
At 17:13 23/10/2001 +0200, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
I want to use docbook as vocabulary for web site content, i've seen a
couple of sites built this way. Could you plz expalin me what I need to do
(to learn, to design, to write etc.) in order to achieve this?
Lots of reading.
Get
At 11:18 24/10/2001 -0400, Dan York wrote:
Robert,
If there is anyone one out there who has successfully been able to
use DocBook on a PC and who would be willing to help a clueless newbie,
please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We do most of our work on Linux, but I have had no problem
At 11:11 01/11/2001 +0100, Broberg, Mats wrote:
The epic editor version 4.2 includes the DocBook DTD as part of the package,
the 15k Euro price is no longer applicable. If you are interested the price
would be 695 Euros for the Editor and 165 Euros Maintenance for a fixed
license.
Wow,
At 22:43 03/11/2001 +0200, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Hello there!
I've started playing with website DTD and everything seems to be Ok,
except rather long site generation. Is I realize, major part of the
processing time is wasted on download of imported docbook stylesheets from
At 09:06 13/11/2001 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
OK, I can see that; but DocBook doesn't need PSVI properties so this isn't
a problem here. Heck. there's not even a schema for DocBook yet, is there?
Can you try and persuade the laggards that its worthwhile Elliot?
E.g. some example
At 18:13 14/11/2001 +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote:
OK. So lets have extended links in DocBook. With ~400 elements, DocBook
always provided features that most users didn't use, but they were there
for few people who needed them.
Lot of truth in that Norm!
The XML ahead is a docbook instance?
At 16:19 15/11/2001 -0800, Earl Bingham wrote:
Since I have heard that all new standards with W3 and since .NET is
completely XML Schema related, is DTD's dead?
No.
OK?
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the
At 11:47 29/11/2001 -0600, Scott Bolte wrote:
At this point I'm going to abandon the use of legalnotice
and use a warning or something else that will highlight
the importance of the message. Before I do that though,
I'd like to make sure I'm not missing some
At 13:56 16/10/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
What's the plan:
The overall plan is to allow people to author Help Sets using all of
the rich technical structure of DocBook without shoe-horning it into
the classical print book model.
Guessing that 'topics' could be viewed in a similar way to
At 10:11 03/12/2001 +0100, Christoph Steinbeck wrote:
Having to write a customization wrapper stylesheet is clear from your
documentation of docbook.sf.net, but is there any documentation on the
switches that can be used for customization? Say, to switch the line
separation to 1.5 lines in the
At 15:57 13/12/2001 -0500, Rowland, Cindy wrote:
Anyone know of a list of organizations using DocBook? I'm trying to get a
feeling for how wide-spread DocBook is and in what industries.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/reference.html#d53e60
May give you a clue.
HTH DaveP
At 14:24 15/12/2001 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
In other words, attributes should be reserved for lists of tokens, numbers,
simple datatypes, etc.
One nice consequence of this rule is that the need for entity
references (most frequently character entity references) in attribute
values is
At 07:46 03/01/2002 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
Well, varlistentrys can have multiple terms, but yes. However, wanna bet
the number of people confused by assoclist is roughly equal to the number
of people confused by variablelist? :-)
But far greater than the number who understand the HTML
At 14:37 15/01/2002 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
The DocBook TC has had several discussions about additional places in
DocBook where it would be beneficial to allow metainfo. Our current
candidate list of places is:
equation, example, figure, informalequation, informalexample,
How might the 'typedef struct' section below be marked up please?
First (void) part is a funcsynopsis markup,
but I'm stuck with the typedef.
Any help appreciated.
Regards DaveP
The driver may replace the generic access control functions for an entity by
it's own ones. This is done with the
I can't find any markup for a macro (call).
Is there any please?
Regards DaveP
At 13:23 24/01/2002 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| At 19:48 23/01/2002 -0600, Michael Smith wrote:
|Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| I can't find any markup for a macro (call).
|
| Is there any please?
|
|Hi Dave,
|
|I think you need
At 11:39 07/03/2002 +0100, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
Is there a similar module for SVG as well yet? Or, even better, since i need
to use both in one source, a module to support both MathML and SVG in
DocBook? In CVS perhaps?
On the w3c svg page, there is a mathml to svg piece.
Might help?
Then
At 13:42 09/04/2002 -0400, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Uhm, you don't like the frames ?
I understood the intent, just totally missed the solution :-)
Well, the idea is that you can browse the document structure, content, as
well as annotations in parallel. Right now I'm more or less trying to
mimic
At 23:49 27/04/2002 -0700, Jesse Proulx wrote:
I'm new to this mailing list, and Michael (xmldoc) suggested that I announce
the new #docbook channel here.
Its #docbook on irc.openprojects.net, and the only rule so far is just to be
polite.
24/7 ??
How about a time/dow as a starting point?
At 22:19 04/05/2002 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
I have applied norms XSLT FO transform (version 1.50.0) to produce an
output xml file in FO format (using several processors including xsltproc
and saxon). I then attempted to use FOP to create pdf output from this FO
file, this resulted in FOP
At 11:17 06/05/2002 -0400, Dan York wrote:
Last time we (the DocBook Open Repository team) discussed it, the
general feeling was that Make was still more broadly available than
ant and was thus more appropriate.
100% agreed... warts and all, make is still the only thing you can count
on
At 18:32 06/05/2002 +0200, Holger Krug wrote:
Today it is very difficult to *make docbook*, it takes several hours
to find all the resources needed,
Good point Holger.
Unless you've done it before, the full list of 'bits I need'
are quite tiresome to track down.
Worth a webpage on both oasis,
At 20:56 06/05/2002 +0200, Jirka Kosek wrote:
I'm able to make stylesheets in Win32 environment using Cygwin. Having
better and more automatically working making environment (based on make
or ant) will be plus, but there are more important things I think.
Agreed.
Normall people are not forced
At 12:13 10/05/2002 +0100, O'Donnell, Vincent wrote:
(using stylesheets 1.50)
I don't think I am using a customization layer, but here is an example of
the offending fo,
snip/
I don't understand all the things in there (know where I can get
explanations?) - I think it looks like it should work
At 01:31 17/05/2002 -0600, Mike Brown wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to use Simplified DocBook 1.0b2. I have a couple of questions
about it. I've only dabbled in DocBook before, so please forgive my ignorance
or point me to a FAQ or more appropriate forum if this isn't the place to ask.
Hi Mike.
At 15:15 21/05/2002 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Agenda: 21 May 2002
9b. XML Character entities
Mike: Looking at some Linux distributions and a distribution for the
CygWin system, I noticed that they are
At 02:03 30/05/2002 +0800, Ming Fai wrote:
I use docbook as the format to store content for my website. Now, there is a
new page that need to use Macromedia Flash (.swf) file. After looked at the
reference of mediaobject, it seems none of them is for holding this kind of
web animation file. And
At 11:25 10/06/2002 -0400, Val Schmidt wrote:
I wasn't sure if this was a development-only list or if I can ask newbie
questions. I apologize if these are bothersome and kindly ask that
someone point me in a direction where I can get some help if they are.
Second, I'd like to include an
At 17:44 14/06/2002 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 08:25:34AM -0400, Phil Griffin wrote:
The readme.txt file appears as a single line of
characters interspersed with black blobs when
opened on a Windows box using the Notepad program.
Isn't Notepad an obsolete and mostly
At 09:09 26/06/2002 -0400, Jason Foster wrote:
snip/
Would a marginalia be considered an annotation?
In textbooks a (somewhat) common layout is to divide the page into two
columns (65%,35%?) where the inside columns contain the full text and the
outside columns contain a
At 10:49 27/06/2002 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
How do people feel annotation would relate to footnote and remark ?
Markup wise, same thing different name?
It seems to me that remark would be just a special case of
annotation (class=(Editorial|ProofReader), and maybe a couple
more), and that
At 06:15 27/06/2002 -0500, Michael Smith wrote:
If we were to add an Annotation element, I think it could be of use
for the HTML title attribute if a processing application (e.g. the
DocBook XSL stylesheets) were to just convert all the Annotation
content to text -- strip out any tags the
At 05:10 19/07/2002, David Kilgour wrote:
I would like my QA entries to be numbered:
Q1
A
Q2
A
and for this numbering to continue across chapters. I would like to do
this with both dsssl and xml docbook. Any suggestions welcome.
If you look at www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook the qandaset there
is
At 11:28 22/07/2002, BigSmoke wrote:
Hiya anyone,
I'm interested in writing a Dutch translation of Docbook: The Definitive
Guide.
I'm curious as to which XML sources to download and how. I'm not
familiar with CVS. Any pointers which don't involve learning everything
about CVS will be
At 07:11 27/07/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a hierarchical reference list for the current
docbook elements somewhere? you know, grouped by association
or category or something like that.
I'd suggest the index in docbook, the definitive guide,
though perhaps a seperate index into
At 08:58 27/07/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
actually, i'm in the process of creating a hierarchical list
(in emacs outline mode) of all of the elements listed in TDG
(updated when i get the chance).
when i'm done, i can post it if anyone's interested. the
point is to list elements in
At 09:12 27/07/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
just fyi, here's the first part of it so you can see what i'm
trying to do. it's in emacs outline mode at the moment:
snip/
... and so on. just a really quick reference to related
elements. so nothing like this is available on the net
somewhere
At 05:34 28/07/2002, Vitaly Ostanin wrote:
Hello!
1.
I'm join modular DocBook/XML documents and get errors for already
declared values of ID attributes (each in separated documents).
It's possible to do common attribute id uniq not for all document, in some levels
only ?
No, the id values
At 08:06 28/07/2002, Vitaly Ostanin wrote:
It's possible to do common attribute id uniq not for all document, in some levels
only ?
No, the id values must be unique to the whole document you are parsing.
Then authors of modular documents must to use long name values for id's. And this
names
At 00:20 29/07/2002, Vitaly Ostanin wrote:
E.g. a chapter on subject pages,
chapter id='pgs'
then
example id='pgs.ex.1'
etc,
so the names relate to the subject?
Yes, but for separated documents we must to use:
id=full.path.with.sub.parts.of.set.document-name.pgs.ex.1
for it be unique.
At 14:44 01/08/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dave Pawson wrote:
!DOCTYPE section PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN
/sgml/oasis/docbook412/docbookx.dtd
!ENTITY tdgHome /documentation/tdg/en/html/
snip
what about for 4.2 rather than 4.1.2? or is that a silly
At 04:47 02/08/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
You dreamed of it, Norm did it :)
the man is a stud.
Oh I wouldn't go that far at least not in the hearing
of his better half :-)
At 16:37 05/08/2002, David Cramer wrote:
http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/docbook.html It's officially an alpha
version of the book, but I have a feeling Norm will chime in and tell us
whether all the new elements are there :)
Some folks are also working on a handy reference card, tho it appears
At 11:12 12/08/2002, David Cramer wrote:
Sorry, I'm not. That comment was based only on a quick spot check
comparing elements having the v4.2 icon at
http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/docbook.html and the ref cards. I noticed
that things like bibliocoverage, bibliorelation, bibliosource, were
At 19:17 14/08/2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
If the 'pass through' of role, to 'class' in the html were available via the
stylesheets,
that would be easy... wouldn't it?
Yes, it would be easy to pass it through. But
the class attribute is already occupied by the
element name, such as div
At 00:17 15/08/2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
I notice that the HTML 4.0 spec says the class attribute
can be a space-separated list of names. That sounds like
you could have both element name and role value as
class values in a div class attribute. But how do you
write CSS to deal with that, and do
At 05:24 16/08/2002, ed nixon wrote:
Before this is made a permanent feature, I'd like to suggest it be checked thoroughly
against the modern browsers at least, i.e. 6 and above. (Sorry, but I've seen IE
5.x described as the Netscape 4 of the modern browser world.)
In my experience, the CSS
At 11:31 16/08/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
| I have a couple of remarks about it:
|
| - the capitalization in the list is not consistent
Yes, this is a lingering issue as the book makes the transition from
SGML (where case didn't matter and CamelCase was the order of the day)
to XML (where it
At 23:49 18/08/2002, Jens Stavnstrup wrote:
This looks ok on Linux, tried out on
Konqueor 2.2.2
Opera 6.0.2
Mozilla 0.9.9
I think thats a fair summary of the browsers?
I'm plus one for the change Norm.
Regards DaveP
At 04:13 20/08/2002, Michael Smith wrote:
During the next monthly DocBook TC telcon, the TC will discuss adding
URL/URN markup to the DocBook DTD.
So, can others on the list please comment on their needs/expectations
regarding URN/URL markup?
Specifically:
* Would adding 'url' and 'urn' to
At 06:56 20/08/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
phraseHello Worldannotation class=noteA common test phrase/annotation/phrase
Simple display of annotations puts them inline:
Hello World[aAnnotation/a]
+1, blatent.
Discrete keeps them off the screen by percolating the link up to the
containing
At 01:16 22/08/2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
Footnotes are annotations, but not all annotations must be
footnotes, even in print. I'm hoping the annotation
mechanism might be used to put annotations next to
paragraphs in a wide page margin. It looks like FO might
even handle that using
At 19:55 05/09/2002, Paul Grosso wrote:
The tool is merely subsetting the list of tags it shows the user
when the user goes to a menu of tags I can insert here. But
it's still valid to insert (or have) any tag in the full DTD, and
you can always click the button on the tool that says show me
At 12:42 06/09/2002, Michael Smith wrote:
Anyway, about the question at the end of number 3 above -- But what will
that do to interchange? -- It seems like interchange isn't an issue if
* the customized DTDs are strict subsets of the complete DTD
* and users/user communities treat their
At 22:14 06/09/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
[...]
Taking things slightly out of order...
| Just for kicks, how difficult would it be to refactor DocBook into
| a simple core (based on Simplified DocBook, or the moral equivalent),
| and implement
At 00:03 07/09/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
| I suspect it wouldn't be difficult at all. Most of that work is
| already done in TDG. Identifying the most important core 25-50
| elements might be a little tricky,
I tried to identify the core 25-50 elements, I wound up with more than 100.
Start
At 18:22 11/09/2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Hi there.
How do I best go about referencing figures and examples, so that
I only get their number in the rendered output, when using the DocBook
XSL stylesheets?
Example:
para
Example reference/ shows ...
/para
At 04:38 12/09/2002, Michael Smith wrote:
Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
/ Zhuravleva, Tatyana [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I've been trying to download the URI resolver from
| http://wwws.sun.com/software/xml/developers/resolver/
| for two weeks now; keep getting some
At 12:47 02/10/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/ Bob Stayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| I noticed you also tried to use the inheritnum=inherit attribute
| for any interior nested orderedlists.
| That also does not appear to be implemented in the
At 18:35 02/10/2002, Federico Sacerdoti wrote:
Hello,
We here at SDSC love docbook as everyone does. I have a question about how we can
make our HTML ToC look better. Currently, our Rocks cluster homepage,
http://www.rocksclusters.org/, is very simple, and I feel hard to visually parse.
At 11:55 04/10/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
| Why the content of the acronym elements are not rendered
| when generating a glossary document?
Because I have no idea how best to render them in the general case.
But I'm open to suggestions.
emcontent/em
As a suggestion, html.
Equivalent fo
At 00:27 07/10/2002, ed nixon wrote:
I can't resist even though I should have done an archive search before posting: given
that Topic Maps came out of the early DocBook efforts, what has been done by folks on
the list or elsewhere to implement Topic Maps over DocBook and/or a collection of
At 21:26 08/10/2002, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Not really. Basically if you give a filename as an input it may have
to be used later to build an URI from an URI-Reference and there things
were turning nasty if you were using Windows path names like c:\foo\bar
for example ../foo2 would give back
At 18:50 09/10/2002, Daniel Veillard wrote:
OK. I'm getting used to x: or file:///x: or similar not working.
What I've not seen is a way of getting round it.
Okay, then like for any libxslt/libxml2 bug tell the conditions where
this give a problem, and I will try to fix it (or get it
At 16:43 10/10/2002, Joachim Ziegler wrote:
BTW, I've written a book about learning programming. It was coded in Latex
(and in German). I'm currently evaluating DocBook as a basis for the second
print of this book or for some other book about programming (mainly because I
like the ability to
At 15:45 16/10/2002, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
* Norman Walsh; [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 16 Oct, 2002 wrote:
I'm personally quite unhappy with this proposal as it's written. It
me too with what I see below :-)
adds five fairly general sounding element names (setup, scenario,
task, objective, and
At 02:28 19/10/2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
Carefully document his processing expectations. I mean, if you rely on
foreignphrase or emphasis or even phrase with (or without) a role
attribute to give special presentation, write that down somewhere.
It'll save you hours of pain later when you give
At 21:18 11/10/2002, Joachim Ziegler wrote:
An exercise consists of a problem and eventually its solution(s).
In a course, when it comes to an exercise, I might say Write a program that
outputs HELLO WORLD. There is no question/answer involved here.
If I were a student, I'd interpret that as:
At 03:28 07/11/2002, David Novak wrote:
I tried to fix all these bugs, and for some of the processors I
almost succeeded but when I finally got messages like:
Don't know how to chunk with SAXON 7.2 from Michael Kay
I almost stopped to trust in XML world...
AFAIK docbook doesn't work with xslt
At 09:31 08/11/2002, Adrian Matellanes wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently using Norman's SLIDE doctype from CVS, everything works well
but I cannot generate pdf handouts with 'fo' xsl.
I get the following error: cannnot find /sourceforge/xsl/docbook.xsl
Does anybody know how can I solve
At 19:39 24/11/2002, Uten Navn wrote:
If you are on a slow line and have Java installed (suppose you have to compile
docbooks..:o) you definitely want jedit. It is a reasonable small download. 1.4MB
beats the 17MB download for emacs. Just observe that the package manager requires a
At 13:06 25/11/2002, Anton N. Mescheryakov wrote:
So, can anyone tell how can I work with such a boss and still use DocBook to write
and publish?
Shoot him :-)
I know some anti-Word tools out there, but how good actualy they are?
If he doesn't want to listen, no matter what you say,
you
At 15:35 28/11/2002 +0900, Michael Smith wrote:
The DocBook Technical Committee would like to ask for comments from
readers of this list about a request for an enhancement to the DocBook
DTD, RFE 613293, 'Generalize programlisting'[1], which proposes that the
DTD be enhanced in some way to
example
programlisting format=linespecific
lt;fo:block id={@id} co id=l11/
lt;xsl:apply-templates/lt;/fo:block
lt;/xsl:template
lt;xsl:template match=xref
lt;fo:inline lt;fo:basic-link
internal-destination={@idref} co id=l2/
Chapter
/programlisting
:15 Dave Pawson --
!DOCTYPE webpage SYSTEM ../nw/docbook/website3/website.dtd
webpage navto=yes id=dbroot
head
titleDocbook Frequently Asked Questions/title
summaryDocbook FAQ/summary
keywordsdocbook faq FAQ/keywords
/head
qandaset
qandaentry
question
para/para
/question
answer
At 23:12 01/12/2002 +, Joseph Panico wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the xsl stylesheets (docbook.xsl) from the DocBook open
repository with the ant 'style' task. By default, ant invokes Xalan and
Xalan chokes on some XPath statement in those stylesheets. Supposedly
Saxon will work, but
At 16:35 06/12/2002 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
It really seems like we shouldn't need all of these: programlisting,
screen, synopsis, literallayout, and verbatim.
How does this sound:
1. Add 'verbatim'.
!ELEMENT verbatim (...)
!ATTLIST verbatim
class(normal|monospaced) monospaced
At 14:06 26/01/2003 +0100, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
At 01:53 PM 1/26/2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
you can email me offline with your offerings, unless there are
others who are also interested. thanks.
Others are interested, I am :-) please email me too.
If questions are answered on the list,
I'll
At 02:17 27/01/2003 -0800, Bob Stayton wrote:
You are in luck. I just uploaded the new version of
my Using the DocBook XSL Stylesheets, and it includes
a new section on using Website.
http://www.sagehill.net/xml/docbookxsl/PreCustom.html#Website
OK, I give in.
Bob, would you put me down
I'm writing about XML.
I can identify elements, attributes but AFAIK I can't identify
namespaces semantically?
Any suggestions please?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e
semantically?
Any suggestions please?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards
--
Dave Pawson
is not
tag, nor other part of markup.
I am talking about a namespace...
so
uri class='namespace'x.y.z/uri seems good to me.
I can style it as needed using css.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
of
the markup in a document.
If I want to say
I have a namespace http://example.com
and a prefix
bob:
How should I mark it up.
Back to you Bob.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
namespace name is not a type of URI.
Tell you what Peter.
I'll ask the stupid questions.
You come back with the 'right' answers, to guide us,
and the db comittee can think about it for a while.
Agreed?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
/msg00107.html
hth
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/
ref name=db.technical.inlines/
ref name=db.markup.inlines/
/choice
ref name=db.co/!-- DP. Error Duplicated below? --
ref name=db.co/
/choice
/define
A duplicate reference to db.co
regards
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
sure you'll get help.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jirka Kosek wrote:
Dave Pawson wrote:
Could I request a (negative) addition to the schema please.
define name=db._any
a:documentationAny element from almost any
namespace/a:documentation
element
anyName
except
nsName/
nsName ns=http
/para
/callout
/calloutlist
/example
No reason I can't have 5 callouts, each specifying the same co element?
Does that helpl?
btw, I hope you have the appropriate customisation in place, to use
the Unicode glyphs instead of just numbers?
regards
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO
From a quick look, it appears as if there is no version information in
the .rng file for the docbook schema itself?
!-- DocBook V5.0CR3--
!-- See http://docbook.org/ns/docbook --
Seems the only reference?
I'd find it helpful if it were available.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
something? Is it a case for a little local
customization of the Docbook schema?
Variant on dedication?
Acknowledgments?
contractsponsor?
Not many books 'acknowledge' the recipient...
not many are written for one person / group of people!
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http
1 - 100 of 946 matches
Mail list logo
