OK, I did'nt notice these directives enclosed other ones.
No problem for me if current display stays unchanged.
Lucien
Le 10/05/2016 à 08:33, Luca Toscano a écrit :
2016-05-10 7:16 GMT+02:00 Christophe JAILLET
>:
2016-05-10 7:16 GMT+02:00 Christophe JAILLET
:
>
> But (not directly related), in the same frame, under "Directives", some
>> directive names are between < and > and some are not.
>> See for example
>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_authz_core.html
>>
But (not directly related), in the same frame, under "Directives",
some directive names are between < and > and some are not.
See for example
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/en/mod/mod_authz_core.html
I looked at corresponding XML file, and saw that, for example, Require
directive section
Hi to all,
OK, Thanks Luca for this improvment and its port to 2.4 branch ; I find
it very useful, particularly "Known bugs".
But (not directly related), in the same frame, under "Directives", some
directive names are between < and > and some are not.
See for example
2016-04-29 9:10 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis :
> but perhaps "Doc Feedback" instead of "Comments" . . .
>
> (this could decrease the number of Q/A comments)
>
I would prefer to keep Comments since it is easier to read, plus we have a
big warning about Q/A comments that
but perhaps "Doc Feedback" instead of "Comments" . . .
(this could decrease the number of Q/A comments)
Le 28/04/2016 à 20:52, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
Le 28/04/2016 à 09:44, Luca Toscano a écrit :
2016-04-27 14:49 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener >:
Le 28/04/2016 à 09:44, Luca Toscano a écrit :
2016-04-27 14:49 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener >:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Lucien Gentis
> wrote:
> I think of
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Lucien Gentis
wrote:
> I think of something like "Comments about this doc", since these are only
> comments about the doc.
Doc Feedback? I think space is at a premium in that sidebar.
I think of something like "Comments about this doc", since these are
only comments about the doc.
Le 27/04/2016 à 12:30, Luca Toscano a écrit :
2016-04-26 10:08 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano >:
2016-04-26 9:08 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis
2016-04-26 10:08 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>
> 2016-04-26 9:08 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis :
>
>
>> --- In mod_lua, "Comments" appears as an item of "Bugfix checklist", but
>> in event, it appears as an item of "See also"
>
>
> Very good point,
On 04/26/2016 03:08 AM, Luca Toscano wrote:
> --- Why is HTTPD in capitals ? It's written httpd in whole doc ?
>
>
> IIRC was asked on IRC as way to put the HTTPD name in evidence and to be
> more consistent with naming across the docs, but I have to admit that I
> haven't checked very
2016-04-26 9:08 GMT+02:00 Lucien Gentis :
>
>
> Le 25/04/2016 13:49, Rich Bowen a écrit :
>
>> This is great. And it'll have the side-effect that it's likely to help
>> us identify issues that have been open for ages and are either already
>> addressed, or could be
Le 25/04/2016 13:49, Rich Bowen a écrit :
This is great. And it'll have the side-effect that it's likely to help
us identify issues that have been open for ages and are either already
addressed, or could be addressed.
Thanks,
On 04/24/2016 05:18 PM, Luca Toscano wrote:
New version just
Le 24/04/2016 à 23:18, Luca Toscano a écrit :
New version just committed, examples:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_lua.html
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/event.html
Luca
You could help even more bug-report with something like:
This is great. And it'll have the side-effect that it's likely to help
us identify issues that have been open for ages and are either already
addressed, or could be addressed.
Thanks,
On 04/24/2016 05:18 PM, Luca Toscano wrote:
>
>
> New version just committed, examples:
>
>
2016-04-22 8:19 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
> +docs@
>
> 2016-04-20 23:25 GMT+02:00 Marion & Christophe JAILLET <
> christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>:
>
>> Le 20/04/2016 19:37, Luca Toscano a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-04-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
Please forgive me, I'm not ignoring you, just leading up to a major
conference tomorrow. I'll try to look at this in the airport today.
On Apr 18, 2016 3:46 PM, "Luca Toscano" wrote:
>
>
> 2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>> Hi docs@!
>>
+docs@
2016-04-20 23:25 GMT+02:00 Marion & Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>:
> Le 20/04/2016 19:37, Luca Toscano a écrit :
>
>
>
> 2016-04-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>>
>>
>> 2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano <
>>
2016-04-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>
> 2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
>
>> Hi docs@!
>>
>> I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when
>> finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES
2016-04-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano :
> Hi docs@!
>
> I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when
> finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and Bugzilla
> first. Most of the times occasional users (or even experienced
On 04/12/2016 05:38 AM, Luca Toscano wrote:
Hi docs@!
I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when
finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and
Bugzilla first. Most of the times occasional users (or even experienced
ones) tend to forget where
* Luca Toscano wrote:
> Hi André,
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> 2016-04-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 André Malo :
> > Hi Luca,
> >
> > * Luca Toscano wrote:
> > > Hi docs@!
> > >
> > > I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices
> > > when finding inconsistencies
Hi Christophe,
thanks for the feedback!
2016-04-12 18:57 GMT+02:00 Christophe JAILLET :
> Hi,
>
> I don't think it would be the right place for that.
> When I'm looking for some doc, I'm not looking for changelog or bug
> reports.
> I expect the doc to be
Hi André,
Thanks for the feedback!
2016-04-12 14:53 GMT+02:00 André Malo :
> Hi Luca,
>
> * Luca Toscano wrote:
>
> > Hi docs@!
> >
> > I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when
> > finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and
Hi,
I don't think it would be the right place for that.
When I'm looking for some doc, I'm not looking for changelog or bug reports.
I expect the doc to be up-to-date and to have compatibility notes when
needed (new functionality, changed behavior...)
Maybe an entry on the main page
Hi Luca,
* Luca Toscano wrote:
> Hi docs@!
>
> I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when
> finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and Bugzilla
> first. Most of the times occasional users (or even experienced ones) tend
> to forget where the
Hi docs@!
I have been thinking a way to inform users about our best practices when
finding inconsistencies in the docs, namely checking CHANGES and Bugzilla
first. Most of the times occasional users (or even experienced ones) tend
to forget where the changelog is, if httpd uses bugzilla or not,
27 matches
Mail list logo