According to this thread:
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(
comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows
Subject: Language problems reading the documentation
)
Should we add a link to the english original on translated documents?
I'd personally say: yes, makes sense. Not only because of negotiation
I'm going to write up some of our observations over the next few days as
I have time, and was hoping to stir up a little interest so that when I
have something, some folks will be willing to take a look at it.
You'll get a lot of interest ;-)
Maybe I won't be able to tell you exactly, if you
I do not want to download the whole cvs tree with
cvs checkout httpd-docs-2.0
Is there a better/shorter way to check the documents' status?
You can check the cvs content of every single document online. Try
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-docs-2.0/manual/ for the 2.0
manual
Kess
nd 2002/09/22 20:40:12
Modified:docs/manual sitemap.html.en sitemap.xml
docs/manual/mod directives.xml index.xml quickreference.xml
docs/manual/style modulesynopsis.dtd
docs/manual/style/xsl common.xsl directiveindex.xsl
I've started to convert the SSL/TLS Encryption section.
Hopefully it will all be done tonight.
/Thomas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.northernsecurity.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.se.linux.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hello, all!
I browsed httpd.apache.org website but couldn't find good documentation
on Apache modules API. I only found several articles and
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/apidoc/ draft.
So I have 2 questions:
1. Is http://httpd.apache.org/dev/apidoc/ the best manual I can get? 2.
If there is no
I agree with Rich that something re. Apache security, even if it was just
links, would be useful.
I would also like to see something re. Apache on Win32, here we have to run
Apache on that platform.
I noticed in O'Reilly's Apache: The Definitive Guide, p. 206:
[near the beginning of the chapter
André Malo wrote:
Should we add a link to the english original on translated documents?
I'd personally say: yes, makes sense. Not only because of negotiation
problems. The english version is also semantically the original document.
So a reader might want to read it, when he easily wants to
Joshua Slive wrote:
André Malo wrote:
This requires a patch of build.xml
- Because of reasons I really don't understand the processor otherwise
runs out of memory (!?).
- sitemap.xml can't be validated any longer, because it's included as
Entity
I'll commit this, but I'm note entirely happy.
Hello,
Could someone take a look at this patch and possibly commit it(2.0 docs)?
The changes are small, mostly almost pedantic, but clarifying. For
example, where there now reads NT/2000, there would be NT/2000/XP, some
typos, and a small change to the subheadings.
BTW, the current visual
Erik Abele wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
One thing we could do -- at least for the index pages -- is to change
the xml file to directly include the page-specific stylesheet and have
that stylesheet get what it needs from common.xsl with an include.
(Right now we have the reverse; every page
Hi Rich,
Do not give the user or group the server runs as
write permissions to the log directory if the server is started as
root.
That's the way that it is now. SSL logs as the web server user, as
does mod_throttle, and mod_gzip. If you don't give that user access
to write to the log
12 matches
Mail list logo
