Re: directive index

2003-01-20 Thread Ilia Soldis
> Looks like a missing module file. Is this the only error output? Here is the full log of the output: Buildfile: build.xml ru: xslt: [style] Transforming into docs/manual [style] Processing docs/manual/mod/directives.xml.ru to docs/manual/mod/directives.html.ru.koi8-r [style] Load

Re: directive index

2003-01-20 Thread Erik Abele
> Von: "Ilia Soldis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Antworten an: docs@httpd.apache.org > Datum: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:32:07 +0300 > An: > Betreff: Re: directive index > > >> Looks like a missing module file. Is this the only error output? > > Here is the full log of the output: > > Buildfile: build.xml

Antwort: [STATUS] (httpd-docs-2.0) Wed Jan 15 23:45:43 EST 2003

2003-01-20 Thread Michael . Schroepl
> Decisions pending > = > - /manual/x.y/ > +1: nd > -0: Kess I am +1 for the "/manual/x.y/" idea, as it makes the "/manual/" directory a project tree containing all other documentation variants, whereas "/docs-x.y" does not (keeps several such directories as independent trees).