Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/conf httpd-win.conf

2003-11-17 Thread Andr Malo
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of questions about this. I'm -0 on it, because using ScriptInterpretersource registry without further explanation of the flaws

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/conf httpd-win.conf

2003-11-17 Thread Joshua Slive
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of questions about this. I'm -0 on it, because using

Re[2]: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/conf httpd-win.conf

2003-11-17 Thread Astrid Keßler
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of questions about this. I'm -0 on it, because using