Re: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch

General question to all lurking in this thread... On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:48 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > [Note switch to docs@] > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> The 1.3 and 2.0 docs died due to lack of interest, not due

Re: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch

[Note switch to docs@] On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 02/22/2018 01:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Luca Toscano >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> does this mean also removing the doc pages? If so

Re: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > does this mean also removing the doc pages? If so I'd be a little bit > concerned, there are still a lot of people using 2.2 and even not-up-to-date > documentation is still better than nothing. Maybe we could send