On 14/05/2011, at 11:50, planas wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 21:20 -0400, John Shabanowitz wrote:
>
>> Are we going to use version 2.0 or 3.0? Is it good enough to cover the whole
>> blog? We can put the link in a text box in the sidebar with the posts are
>> solely the opinions of the authors
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 21:20 -0400, John Shabanowitz wrote:
> Are we going to use version 2.0 or 3.0? Is it good enough to cover the whole
> blog? We can put the link in a text box in the sidebar with the posts are
> solely the opinions of the authors and do not express official policy of The
> Doc
On 14/05/2011, at 11:20, John Shabanowitz wrote:
> Are we going to use version 2.0 or 3.0?
3.0. I believe that is what is used on the LibreOffice website and the TDF
blog.
> Is it good enough to cover the whole blog?
Yes. That is, I believe, who it's usually handled. It's possible to put a
Are we going to use version 2.0 or 3.0? Is it good enough to cover the whole
blog? We can put the link in a text box in the sidebar with the posts are
solely the opinions of the authors and do not express official policy of The
Document Foundation nor LibreOffice.
*John Shabanowitz
http://libodocs.
We also need a copyright statement (the CC-BY-SA, I think it is) and a
statement that posts by individuals don't necessarily reflect official policy.
Not sure of wording of the latter and don't have time right now to look it up.
--Jean
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@l
It looks good John!
~Elliot
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:34 PM, John Shabanowitz wrote:
> I think we'll have to settle for whatever wordpress.org offers as their
> widget. I'll put the cloud on the sidebar. We can decide to keep it or not,
> later.
> *John Shabanowitz
> http://libodocs.wordpress.
I think we'll have to settle for whatever wordpress.org offers as their
widget. I'll put the cloud on the sidebar. We can decide to keep it or not,
later.
*John Shabanowitz
http://libodocs.wordpress.com
We're recruiting, come join us.*
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Elliot Turner wrote:
> What
What Lana said.
It's good that you're organizing this ahead of time. It will help keep
everything in order as the blog develops.
A good way of thinking about it is that tags might give a small SEO bump to
a post by repeating keywords, whereas categories make a blog easier for
users to navigate th
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 11:29 +1000, Lana Brindley wrote:
> On 05/13/2011 11:17 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:57 +1000, Lana Brindley wrote:
> >
> >> Tags and categories can complement each other. No need to use one over
> >> the other.
> >
> >
> > Is one or the other pref
On 05/13/2011 11:17 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:57 +1000, Lana Brindley wrote:
Tags and categories can complement each other. No need to use one over
the other.
Is one or the other preferred for particular purposes? Or is it more
that individual readers might prefer
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:57 +1000, Lana Brindley wrote:
> Tags and categories can complement each other. No need to use one over
> the other.
Is one or the other preferred for particular purposes? Or is it more
that individual readers might prefer, or be more accustomed to using,
one or the oth
On 05/13/2011 10:43 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
I have created a bunch of Categories for the posts on our blog, and will
add more as we think of them. Please assign categories to your posts to
help people find them in future when we have a lot. You, or an editor or
admin, can go back and add, re
I have created a bunch of Categories for the posts on our blog, and will
add more as we think of them. Please assign categories to your posts to
help people find them in future when we have a lot. You, or an editor or
admin, can go back and add, remove, or change categories on individual
posts late
13 matches
Mail list logo
