Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Extensions

2012-05-31 Thread toki
On 05/30/2012 02:36 AM, Jean Weber wrote:

 unless they are unusually outstandingly helpful.

What makes an extension unusually outstandingly helpful?
A list of objective criteria.

 We do have a generic statement that people can get extensions from
various places.

Could a list of sites that provide extensions that may work with LibO
3.x be included.
* http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
* http://aoo-extensions.sourceforge.net/
* http://oooconv.free.fr/index_fr.html
* http://sourceforge.net/projects/ooop/files/Extension/

jonathon

  * Unknown - detected
  * English

  * English

 javascript:void(0);

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Extensions

2012-05-31 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think that LO is in an unusual position.  We can really open things up and 
promote non-TDF/LO solutions because it shows that LO is a team player and that 
people wouldn't get locked-in to depending on LO for everything.  

I have been thoroughly enjoying watching NASA videos about the International 
Space Station.  Resupply is sometimes done by Russian rockets, sometimes 
Japanese, sometimes European Space Agency.  The people living or visiting the 
space station are usually from different countries.  American astronauts sent 
up by Russian rockets and all different combinations.  Now with commercial 
rockets joining the mix it is really opening up and that has vastly increased 
the skill-sets, experience, understanding and longer-term viability of each 
country involved in the project.  

Regards from
Tom :)  


--- On Wed, 30/5/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Extensions
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 30 May, 2012, 3:36

IMO we should not be promoting extensions that are not in the LO
extensions repository... unless they are unusually outstandingly
helpful. We do have a generic statement that people can get extensions
from various places.

Also In a few cases, extensions we mention are now bundled with LO
itself  so the wording in the docs needs changing. In some other
cases, including with Calc, some extensions that might have been
listed in an earlier version of the documentation don't actually work
well with LO and should be dropped from our docs... whether they are
in the LO repository or not.

--Jean


On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi :)
 I think it is ok now, to point to the OOo site for things.

 I agree it is better to point to LO sites where possible but we can be fairly 
 confident in OOo Extensions working equally well in LO.  Also when Oracle 
 were running the OOo websites they kept dropping out from time-to-time.  Now 
 that Apache are running them they seem to be up all the time and we can be 
 reasonably confident that they wont suddenly vanish over-night.

 The LO pages for Extensions are likely to continue to be more stable for LO 
 than for Apache because LO has already done it's re-organising and Apache 
 might still shift things around a bit to stream-line them a bit.

 Regards from
 Tom :)


 --- On Mon, 28/5/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Impress Guide version LO3.4
 To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Monday, 28 May, 2012, 11:56

 Yes, good catch. I've been trying to find those and amend or omit them.
 --Jean

 On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:45 PM, John Smith clicks...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Oops. The point to be made is that just changing the site name doesn't mean
 the extension is there.
 John


 On 28/05/2012 11:42, John Smith wrote:

 Hi Jean
 Just to say that in the doc I'm working on now, there's a reference to two
 extensions on the LO extensions website, perhaps changed in an earlier
 version of the doc when going to 3.3, that is in error. What it refers to,
 appears to only be available on the OOo site. Searching on the LO site
 returns zero hits. I have marked it in the doc for further attention.
 John

 On 28/05/2012 01:10, Jean Weber wrote:

 While skimming through the Impress v3.4 chapters, I spotted a few
 errors that are also in v3.5 (I missed them before). I'll fix in both
 versions. The only one I recall right now is a reference to the OOo
 extensions website, which should be the LO extensions website. I'll
 let everyone know when I've done all the minor updates.

 --Jean


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted