Hi :)
Ahhh, so the powerful bit is LibreOffice as a whole rather than Base. Base
'just' provides
1. A convenient container to keep things together
2. Something that ostensibly looks a bit like Access
I don't know that i agree that. From the sidelines it looks as though Base
nearly offers far
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 17:54 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Hmmm, didn't quite understand all that. Does it reduce down to
>
> Forms = Yes, but sometimes have to fix datasource links
>
> Reports = No
>
> Both have problems with some scripts, some of which can be sorted but not
> trivially.
Hi :)
Hmmm, didn't quite understand all that. Does it reduce down to
Forms = Yes, but sometimes have to fix datasource links
Reports = No
Both have problems with some scripts, some of which can be sorted but not
trivially. Both can be used to show static data, such as the final result of a
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:40 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Blimey. i hadn't really appreciated that about Base. Sounds like it might
> be reasonably easy to let people have access to some of the data in the
> database while still keeping other data confidential. So different users
> could
Hi :)
Blimey. i hadn't really appreciated that about Base. Sounds like it might be
reasonably easy to let people have access to some of the data in the database
while still keeping other data confidential. So different users could have
access to different fields.
These Odt's and .Rpt's can
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:12 -0400, Dan Lewis wrote:
> Specifically, LO uses Writer to create forms for Base. Seems to me
> that what Writer creates is "text documents". If not, then what is a
> Base form? Is it a document? If so, what kind?
Yes - it is a standard ODT document.
The differences th
Specifically, LO uses Writer to create forms for Base. Seems to me
that what Writer creates is "text documents". If not, then what is a
Base form? Is it a document? If so, what kind?
--Dan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www
Hi :)
Thanks :) Sorry i am "all talk but no trousers". A classic, sorry
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Wed, 28/3/12, Rick Barnes wrote:
From: Rick Barnes
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-documentation] Updated Base 3.5 Alternate Outline
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 28 March,
On 29/03/2012, at 0:54, "Rick Barnes" wrote:
> Jean,
>
> So you don't have any issues with the latest outline? It is just a suggested
> outline, of course.
No issues at this point, but when I get into it seriously I may well find
things to suggest.
--Jean
> The Appendices may be a bit too m
I use Draw all the time to add a handwritten signature to CAD drawings
that are in PDF format to show they are authorised.
Draw does change the linecap feature of drawn lines from rounded to
square, so on close inspection drawn items are not a clear.
Steve
On 2012-03-28 19:43, Jean Weber wrote
Jean,
So you don't have any issues with the latest outline? It is just a suggested
outline, of course. The Appendices may be a bit too many, but no one has
said anything about it yet...
I was thinking of churning out a couple of appendices, (C and E) to get used
to the template and overall proces
Tom,
Thanks for your feedback. I wrote the outline as a guide for the guide so,
it too, is flexible. And in the course of authoring a chapter one might find
it not the best way to go. Changes are welcome...
>>i think those chapter titles would be better if they started with those
word first.
T
12 matches
Mail list logo
