If you install the Ubuntu Light font in Windows, and use it in say,
Excel, the bug is very evident, as it renders as a bolded Ubuntu font
natively.
I have seen the same behavior in Ubuntu itself, though it is less
reproducible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Aside from the chromium upstream bug
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=627143), I'm not
seeing any issue with the rendering of Ubuntu Light:
- libreoffice renders text correctly when using the Ubuntu font and setting
the character style to light
- firefox and epiphany
Any further progress on this? Why have a bug reporter if bugs are going
to sit out here forever unresolved. This is a definite issue with the
metadata in the fonts. Easily fixable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to
** No longer affects: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu Wily)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to fonts-ubuntu in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
"Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"
Status
** Package changed: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) => fonts-ubuntu
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
"Ubuntu
Downloaded ubuntu-font-family-0.83 from design.ubuntu.com/font.
This bug also affects me on Debian 9.
If I remove Ubuntu Medium, Ubuntu Light renders properly in LibreOffice.
Also, Microsoft Windows displays Ubuntu Medium's font name as "Ubuntu
Light."
--
You received this bug notification
This is upstream bug
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=627143
(see also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287089#c1)
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1287089
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287089
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
The valid CSS would be:
font-weight: lighter;
In the case of explicitly wanting "Ubuntu Light", once everything is
fixed, the CSS access will hopefully be just:
font-family: "Ubuntu";
font-weight: 300;
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation
Hello Daniel, plan is to switch the fonts for source-built versions.
These source-built fonts should in the first instance be work-alikes
(equivalents) to the binary fonts currently shipped via Google Fonts.
The versions hosted on Google Fonts have undergone various refinements
of the metadata
Partially confirmed on bionic, but maybe not.
LibreOffice writer: Bug exists and "Light" is heavier if you type in
"Ubuntu Light". However if you use "Ubuntu" and right-click on text to
choose Character... > Style=Light, then it is correctly lighter. No bug.
gnome-font-viewer: No bug (light is
Same behaviour in current Bionic installs (package version is the same
as Artful)
** Tags added: artful bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
Confirmed, I am seeing this everywhere that local fonts are being used.
I think it's a fontconfig or related regression.
Mark
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
Attached a sample html which shows the behavior comparing local and
remote fonts (tested in Chromium).
** Attachment added: "reproducer"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-font-family-sources/+bug/1512111/+attachment/5004022/+files/test.html
--
You received this bug
This seems to have regressed in Artful. The local 'Ubuntu' 300 font is
heavier than the one from fonts.google.com.
Font version is:
ii ttf-ubuntu-font-family 1:0.83-0ubuntu2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Assignee: Magdalena Mirowicz (magdalena-mirowicz) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Assignee: Magdalena Mirowicz (magdalena-mirowicz) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Magdalena Mirowicz
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
"Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"
Status in One
FWIW, I'm seeing the same issue after upgrading to Xenial, which
installs 1:0.83-0ubuntu2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-
sources in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512111
Title:
(For want of a better place to put it), useful ttx diffs + changelog
forwarded to me at the end of yesterday which gives more context on what
the above referenced .zip file delivery is.
[Kudos to DM Engineering to doing this in an automated fashion, and
those along the chain for passing it
The test case suggests a change to 'Ubuntu Mono', but the
'Ubuntu_0.831.zip' I have here doesn't have any Ubuntu Mono (nor source,
nor changelog, nor scripting, nor test cases, nor any contextual
information). I can see:
2016-01-04 11:31 Zip file (repacked today?)
2015-12-04 10:55 .ttfs
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Magdalena Mirowicz (magdalena-mirowicz)
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Importance: High => Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family
Assignee: (unassigned) => Magdalena Mirowicz (magdalena-mirowicz)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Documentation Packages, which is subscribed to
21 matches
Mail list logo
