Interesting both spacer of Rob and Ian's issues.

My bloke always fits new condenser & points (in glider lives these spares
plus the cog wheel following Rob Handbury failure at Burketown last year)
In older electronics capacitors do dry out and fail.  10+ yrs ago we had
think 4430 fail in coil and LAME said it was overheating so since then
always add a jet of cooling air to magneto.

I use the fancy Limbach plugs all pre set but usually carry a spare car
plug but what is the suggested gap? .  Think I remember 0.6mm or was it
0.55 mm on magneto and 0.7mm on back up electronic ignition.  Anybody
remember?  I seem to remember reading car plugs life is 150hrs but fancy
plugs is 500hrs but can't find it.

Ian McPhee
0428847642
Box 657 Byron Bay NSW 2481

On 21 Sep 2016 8:22 am, "Rob Thompson" <post...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> G'day all,
>
> Just a reminder that there needs to be an appropriate gap between the
> flywheel and the metal coupling on the magneto.
>
>
> That is, the rubber spider must be the only contact between the engine and
> magneto. Metal to metal will stuff your magneto bearings, effect the engine
> balance and transmit crankshaft harmonics straight into the magneto.
>
>
> The measurement process is detailed in the manual and appropriate gaskets
> can be installed. This technique only works with the engine out.
>
>
> If you are installing the mag in situ, I have only found one way to check
> the gap. Put blobs of blu-tac or plasticine on each outer point of the
> coupling and slide the magneto into place. The blu-tac will squash down and
> you can pull it out and measure the gap. Don't just install the magneto
> with the same spacer gaskets and hope for the best.
>
>
> You can hold the magneto at the timing point with a bit of appropriately
> placed masking tape which will disintegrate as soon as you start the motor.
>
>
> Rob
>
>
> Rob Thompson
>
> 0429 493 828
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* dog@lists.riverland.net.au <dog@lists.riverland.net.au> on behalf
> of Ian Williams <ag...@xtra.co.nz>
> *Sent:* Monday, 19 September 2016 7:43 PM
> *To:* dog@lists.riverland.net.au
> *Subject:* [DOG mailing list] Dimona ZK-GCB
>
>
> Of interest, we have had some Mag problems with our Dimona.   (Slick)
>
> I had just completed its annual inspection which included the 2 yearly Mag
> bench check where both main bearings were noisy so were replaced.  The
> bench test was quite normal. Then reinstalled in the aircraft (not the
> easiest with a Dimona as you would know).
>
> A ground run was done … all normal, then a test flight … again all OK.
>
> However during a second test flight, at around 800 feet, the engine
> suddenly lost power. It would still run … (well sort of)  but could not
> maintain height, so a precautionary landing was made back on the airfield.
>
> I took the mag off and back to the engine shop. .. on the test rig, no
> spark at all.  It was pulled apart and the condenser was stuffed.  A
> replacement installed and all good again.
>
> Still need to reinstall on the aircraft.
>
> This mag / engine had a forced landing in Thailand about 12 mths prior to
> their decommissioning.  The engine was sent back to Limbach and was
> re-lifed, so we were real fortunate that it was zero timed. But not sure
> about the Mag.   The engine has now about 160 hrs TT (also SMOH) in New
> Zealand
>
> I assume the mag was also the original.  We had it bench tested 2 years
> ago prior to the first flight in New Zealand. All OK.
>
> When the mag was pulled apart, the condenser had what looked like somebody
> had put some araldite around where the wire comes out of it. Presumably to
> avoid any strain on the connecting wire.  However it also just may have
> been leakage from the condenser.
>
> So it may be something to consider with the ex Thai Dimona’s that the
> condensers in the Slick  Mags really need to be replaced if there is any
> doubt that they are still the original.
>
> I think there is actually a date stamp on the condenser which could prove
> that.
>
>
>
> Ian Williams
>
> Drury
>
> New Zealand
>
>
>

Reply via email to