On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 06:17:41PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:06:04PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >> Marie Rognes wrote:
> >>> Anders Logg wrote:
> I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
> of
Anders Logg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:06:04PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>
>> Marie Rognes wrote:
>>> Anders Logg wrote:
I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
of Functions.
The main problem seems to be the following:
mes
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >>
> >>> The default update procedure would be interpolation.
> >> Which interpolation? Perhaps the user needs it to be conservat
Anders Logg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
>> Anders Logg wrote:
>>
>>> The default update procedure would be interpolation.
>> Which interpolation? Perhaps the user needs it to be conservative or
>> preserve some other structure. What if they want to use diff
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
>
> > The default update procedure would be interpolation.
>
> Which interpolation? Perhaps the user needs it to be conservative or
> preserve some other structure. What if they want to use different
> schemes for dif
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:06:04PM +, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Marie Rognes wrote:
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> >> I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
> >> of Functions.
> >>
> >> The main problem seems to be the following:
> >>
> >> mesh.refine()
> >>
> >> If
Anders Logg wrote:
> The default update procedure would be interpolation.
Which interpolation? Perhaps the user needs it to be conservative or
preserve some other structure. What if they want to use different
schemes for different functions on that mesh?
You can't implement refinement in-plac
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:00:11AM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
> > of Functions.
> >
> > The main problem seems to be the following:
> >
> > mesh.refine()
> >
> > If we want to allow this, then we need t
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:06:14AM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> So, when you do
>
> mesh.refine()
>
> that automatically replaces the old mesh with the new one? This
> seems ok. As long as the user still has the option of storing the
> old unrefined mesh and associated functions.
>
> How will fu
Shawn Walker wrote:
> So, when you do
>
> mesh.refine()
>
> that automatically replaces the old mesh with the new one? This seems ok.
> As long as the user still has the option of storing the old unrefined mesh
> and associated functions.
>
> How will functions be updated? Just interpolati
So, when you do
mesh.refine()
that automatically replaces the old mesh with the new one? This seems ok.
As long as the user still has the option of storing the old unrefined mesh
and associated functions.
How will functions be updated? Just interpolation? Is that easy to do if
you use som
Marie Rognes wrote:
> Anders Logg wrote:
>> I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
>> of Functions.
>>
>> The main problem seems to be the following:
>>
>> mesh.refine()
>>
>> If we want to allow this, then we need to provide some kind of
>> automated updating of
Anders Logg wrote:
> I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
> of Functions.
>
> The main problem seems to be the following:
>
> mesh.refine()
>
> If we want to allow this, then we need to provide some kind of
> automated updating of functions and function spaces to
I've thought some more on the problem of mesh refinement and updating
of Functions.
The main problem seems to be the following:
mesh.refine()
If we want to allow this, then we need to provide some kind of
automated updating of functions and function spaces to the new mesh,
since this call will
14 matches
Mail list logo